Suppr超能文献

一项比较经皮穴位电刺激联合电磁毫米波对香港脊柱疼痛影响的实验研究。

An experimental study comparing the effects of combined transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation and electromagnetic millimeter waves for spinal pain in Hong Kong.

作者信息

Yip Y B, Tse Hing-Min Sonny, Wu Ka Kalina

机构信息

School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, PR China.

出版信息

Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of combined transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TAES) and electromagnetic millimeter wave (EMMW) therapy as an add-on treatment for pain relief and physical functional activity enhancement among adults with sub-acute non-specific spinal pain in either the low back or neck.

DESIGN

A non-blinded study with data obtained before, immediate, one week and three months after intervention.

SETTING

The Telehealth Clinic and Community Centre, Hong Kong.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-seven subjects with either sub-acute neck or low back pain.

INTERVENTION

Subjects were randomly allocated to either an intervention group (n=23) or a control group (n=24). These groups were then divided into subgroups according to the site of their spinal pain-neck or back. The intervention group had eight treatments over a three-week period of TAES and EMMW.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes from baseline to the end of treatment were assessed at intervals of one week and three months on either neck or low back pain intensity [by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)]; stiffness level; stress level; neck or low back lateral flexion and forward flexion in cm, and interference with daily activities.

RESULTS

The baseline VAS scores for the intervention and control groups were 5.34 and 5.18 out of 10, respectively (P value=0.77). At the one week and three month assessments, there were no significant differences between the groups-VAS (P value=0.09 and 0.27, respectively). A further subgroup of chronic pain sufferers (n=31) was identified and these had significantly reduced pain intensity at the one week assessment (P value=0.04) but this was not sustained at post three months after treatment (P value=0.15). Improvements in stiffness level, stress level, and functional disability level in the intervention group were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that there was a reduction in pain intensity, stress and stiffness level immediately after the eight sessions of treatment (TAES and EMMW), though the effect is not sustained after a week. No pain relief was found with the neck pain subgroup. However, the reduction in subjective average pain intensity among the chronic pain subgroup was sustained at the post one week assessment for the intervention group but not at the post three month assessment.

摘要

目的

比较经皮穴位电刺激(TAES)联合电磁毫米波(EMMW)疗法作为附加治疗手段,对亚急性非特异性颈痛或腰痛成人患者缓解疼痛及增强身体功能活动的疗效。

设计

一项非盲研究,收集干预前、干预后即刻、干预后一周及三个月的数据。

地点

香港远程医疗诊所及社区中心。

参与者

47名患有亚急性颈痛或腰痛的受试者。

干预措施

受试者被随机分为干预组(n = 23)和对照组(n = 24)。然后根据脊柱疼痛部位(颈部或背部)将这些组再分为亚组。干预组在三周内接受8次TAES和EMMW治疗。

观察指标

在治疗一周和三个月时,分别评估颈部或腰部疼痛强度[采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)]、僵硬程度、压力水平、颈部或腰部侧屈和前屈的厘米数以及对日常活动的干扰程度相对于基线的变化。

结果

干预组和对照组的基线VAS评分分别为10分制中的5.34分和5.18分(P值 = 0.77)。在一周和三个月的评估中,两组的VAS评分无显著差异(P值分别为0.09和0.27)。进一步确定了一个慢性疼痛患者亚组(n = 31),这些患者在一周评估时疼痛强度显著降低(P值 = 0.04),但在治疗三个月后未持续(P值 = 0.15)。干预组在僵硬程度、压力水平和功能障碍水平方面的改善不显著。

结论

我们的研究表明,经过8次治疗(TAES和EMMW)后,疼痛强度、压力和僵硬程度立即有所降低,尽管一周后效果未持续。颈部疼痛亚组未发现疼痛缓解。然而,干预组慢性疼痛亚组的主观平均疼痛强度在一周评估时有所降低,但在三个月评估时未持续。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验