Suppr超能文献

采用持续低水平热敷疗法和/或运动治疗急性下腰痛:一项随机对照试验。

Treating acute low back pain with continuous low-level heat wrap therapy and/or exercise: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mayer John M, Ralph Lee, Look Michele, Erasala Geetha N, Verna Joe L, Matheson Leonard N, Mooney Vert

机构信息

U.S. Spine & Sport Foundation, 344 Kearny Villa Road, Suite 307, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2005 Jul-Aug;5(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.03.009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Restorative exercise and palliative modalities are frequently used together for the treatment of acute low back pain. However, little is known about the effects of combining these treatments.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of combining continuous low-level heat wrap therapy with directional preference-based exercise on the functional ability of patients with acute low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at three outpatient medical facilities.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred individuals (age 31.2+/-10.6 years) with low back pain of less than 3 months duration.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was functional ability assessed by the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were disability assessed by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and pain relief assessed by a 6-point verbal rating scale.

METHODS

Participants were randomized to one of four groups: Heat wrap therapy alone (heat wrap, n=25); directional preference-based exercise alone (exercise, n=25); combination of heat wrap therapy and exercise (heat+exercise, n=24); or control (booklet, n=26). Treatment was administered for five consecutive days and included four visits to the study center over 1 week.

RESULTS

At 2 days after the conclusion of treatment (Day 7), functional improvement for heat+exercise was 84%, 95%, and 175% greater than heat wrap, exercise, and booklet, respectively (p<.05). Seventy-two percent of the subjects in the heat+exercise group demonstrated a return to pre-injury function compared with 20%, 20%, and 19% for heat wrap, exercise, and booklet, respectively (p<.05). Disability reduction for heat+exercise was 93%, 139%, and 400% greater than heat wrap, exercise, and booklet, respectively (p<.05). Pain relief for heat+exercise was 70% and 143% greater than exercise and booklet, respectively (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining continuous low-level heat wrap therapy with directional preference-based exercise during the treatment of acute low back pain significantly improves functional outcomes compared with either intervention alone or control. Either intervention alone tends to be more effective than control.

摘要

背景

恢复性运动和姑息治疗方式经常联合用于治疗急性腰痛。然而,对于联合使用这些治疗方法的效果知之甚少。

目的

评估连续低水平热裹疗法与基于方向偏好的运动相结合对急性腰痛患者功能能力的疗效。

研究设计/地点:在三个门诊医疗机构进行了一项随机对照试验。

患者样本

100名(年龄31.2±10.6岁)腰痛持续时间少于3个月的个体。

结局指标

主要结局指标是通过多维任务能力概况问卷评估的功能能力。次要结局是通过罗兰 - 莫里斯残疾问卷评估的残疾情况以及通过6分言语评定量表评估的疼痛缓解情况。

方法

参与者被随机分为四组之一:单独的热裹疗法(热裹,n = 25);单独的基于方向偏好的运动(运动,n = 25);热裹疗法和运动的组合(热 + 运动,n = 24);或对照组(小册子,n = 26)。治疗连续进行五天,包括在1周内到研究中心就诊四次。

结果

在治疗结束后2天(第7天),热 + 运动组的功能改善分别比热裹组、运动组和小册子组高84%、95%和175%(p <.05)。热 + 运动组中72%的受试者恢复到受伤前的功能,而热裹组、运动组和小册子组分别为20%、20%和19%(p <.05)。热 + 运动组的残疾减少分别比热裹组、运动组和小册子组高93%、139%和400%(p <.05)。热 + 运动组的疼痛缓解分别比运动组和小册子组高70%和143%(p <.05)。

结论

在急性腰痛治疗期间,将连续低水平热裹疗法与基于方向偏好的运动相结合,与单独的任何一种干预或对照组相比,能显著改善功能结局。单独的任何一种干预往往比对照组更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验