• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量心脏病发作和心力衰竭治疗效果:结果测量的必要性

Measuring performance for treating heart attacks and heart failure: the case for outcomes measurement.

作者信息

Krumholz Harlan M, Normand Sharon-Lise T, Spertus John A, Shahian David M, Bradley Elizabeth H

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):75-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.75.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.75
PMID:17211016
Abstract

To complement the current process measures for treating patients with heart attacks and with heart failure, which target gaps in quality but do not capture patient outcomes, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed the public reporting of hospital-level thirty-day mortality for these conditions in 2007. We present the case for including measurements of outcomes in the assessment of hospital performance, focusing on the care of patients with heart attacks and with heart failure. Recent developments in the methodology and standards for outcomes measurement have laid the groundwork for incorporating outcomes into performance monitoring efforts for these conditions.

摘要

为补充目前针对心脏病发作和心力衰竭患者的治疗过程措施,这些措施针对质量差距但未涵盖患者预后情况,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)于2007年提议公开报告这些病症的医院层面30天死亡率。我们阐述了将预后测量纳入医院绩效评估的理由,重点关注心脏病发作和心力衰竭患者的护理。预后测量方法和标准的最新进展为将预后纳入这些病症的绩效监测工作奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Measuring performance for treating heart attacks and heart failure: the case for outcomes measurement.衡量心脏病发作和心力衰竭治疗效果:结果测量的必要性
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):75-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.75.
2
Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes.替代性绩效薪酬评分方法:对质量改进和患者结局的影响。
Med Care. 2009 Oct;47(10):1062-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a7e54c.
3
Hospital performance recognition with the Get With The Guidelines Program and mortality for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure.通过“遵循指南”项目对医院绩效的认可与急性心肌梗死和心力衰竭的死亡率
Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):546-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.031.
4
Management strategies to meet the core heart failure measures for acute decompensated heart failure: a nursing perspective.满足急性失代偿性心力衰竭核心治疗指标的管理策略:护理视角
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2007 Oct-Dec;30(4):307-20. doi: 10.1097/01.CNQ.0000290364.57677.56.
5
Evidence-based perspectives on pay for performance and quality of patient care and outcomes in emergency medicine.基于证据的急诊医学中绩效薪酬与患者护理质量及结果的观点。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 May;51(5):622-31. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.010. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
6
The importance of consistent, high-quality acute myocardial infarction and heart failure care results from the American Heart Association's Get with the Guidelines Program.一致、高质量的急性心肌梗死和心力衰竭护理的重要性源于美国心脏协会的 Get with the Guidelines 项目。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 2;58(6):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.012.
7
The need for multiple measures of hospital quality: results from the Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry of the American Heart Association.需要采用多种措施衡量医院质量:来自美国心脏协会 Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure 注册研究的结果。
Circulation. 2011 Aug 9;124(6):712-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026088. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
8
The inverse relationship between mortality rates and performance in the Hospital Quality Alliance measures.医院质量联盟指标中死亡率与绩效之间的负相关关系。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):1104-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1104.
9
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services quality indicators do not correlate with risk-adjusted mortality at trauma centers.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的质量指标与创伤中心经风险调整后的死亡率不相关。
J Trauma. 2010 Apr;68(4):771-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d03a20.
10
Medicare's public reporting initiative on hospital quality had modest or no impact on mortality from three key conditions.医疗保险的医院质量公共报告倡议对三种关键疾病的死亡率没有产生适度或没有影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):585-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0719.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving Equity in Hospital Performance Assessments Using Composite Race-Specific Measures of Risk-Standardized Readmission and Mortality Rates for Heart Failure.使用基于复合种族的心力衰竭风险标准化再入院率和死亡率指标来评估医院绩效中的公平性。
Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):1121-1133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061995. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
Incidence and prognosis of late readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后晚期再入院的发生率和预后。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(5):696-704. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0117. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Structural components for the development of a heart failure network.
心力衰竭网络发展的结构组成部分。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Jun;10(3):1545-1554. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14266. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
4
Measuring and Improving Evidence-Based Patient Care Using a Web-Based Gamified Approach in Primary Care (QualityIQ): Randomized Controlled Trial.使用基于网络的游戏化方法衡量和改进初级保健中的循证患者护理(QualityIQ):随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e31042. doi: 10.2196/31042.
5
Policy and Payment Challenges in the Postpandemic Treatment of Heart Failure: Value-Based Care and Telehealth.后疫情时代心力衰竭治疗的政策和支付挑战:基于价值的护理和远程医疗。
J Card Fail. 2022 May;28(5):835-844. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
6
Validity of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for Severity of Stroke to Predict Mortality Among Patients Presenting With Symptoms of Stroke.美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表对卒中严重程度的有效性,以预测出现卒中症状患者的死亡率。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 5;12(9):e10255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10255.
7
European Society of Cardiology methodology for the development of quality indicators for the quantification of cardiovascular care and outcomes.欧洲心脏病学会制定心血管护理和结局的量化质量指标的方法学。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Jan 5;8(1):4-13. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa069.
8
Evaluating the Impact of Oncology Care Model Reporting Requirements on Biomarker Testing and Treatment.评估肿瘤护理模式报告要求对生物标志物检测和治疗的影响。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Oct;16(10):e1216-e1221. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00747. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Relationship Between Appropriateness and Outcomes: It Is Complicated.适宜性与结果之间的关系:很复杂。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e015115. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015115. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of New Approaches to Improve Mortality Risk Models From Medicare Claims Data.改善 Medicare 索赔数据中死亡率风险模型的新方法的比较效果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197314. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7314.