Eliçevik Mehmet, Tireli Gülay, Demirali Oyhan, Unal Murat, Sander Serdar
Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, Bakirköy Maternal and Childrens' Hospital, Atakoy 9-10, A8 D:3, Istanbul, 34750, Turkey.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2007;39(3):823-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9145-y. Epub 2007 Jan 13.
To determine the key points for a successful redo hypospadias procedure using tubularized incised plate urethroplasty operation.
A retrospective chart review of a cohort of 100 patients (Mean age: 4.5 years, range: 2-12) who had undergone a redo tubularized incised plate urethroplasty operation was performed. Fischer exact and Chi square tests were used for statistical analysis.
The incidence of complications of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty reoperation after failed repairs of meatal advancement and glanuloplasty procedure (n: 14), meatal based flap (n: 36), and tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (n: 50) were 29% (n: 4), 22% (n: 8) and, 28% (n: 14) respectively (P > 0.05). The overall complication rate was 26% (n: 26). Eighteen patients (18%) had fistula, five had meatal stenosis (5%), two had dehiscence (2%) and one had neourethral stenosis (1%). Postoperatively, fistula was closed in 18 patients and 5 underwent meatoplasty. Two patients with dehiscence and one with neourethral stenosis underwent an unsuccessful third redo tubularized incised plate urethroplasty reoperation and they were candidates for a complex hypospadias repair (3%). The ultimate success rate of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty reoperation after treatment of complications was 97%.
Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty is a safe and efficacious alternative procedure for hypospadias reoperations if the urethral plate has no scars and outcome is favourable if the first failed hypospadias repair is a meatal based flap procedure. The complication rate increases if the urethral plate has been previously incised in the midline and a redo third redo must be avoided.
确定采用管状切开包皮板尿道成形术成功进行尿道下裂再次手术的关键点。
对100例接受再次管状切开包皮板尿道成形术的患者(平均年龄:4.5岁,范围:2 - 12岁)进行回顾性病历审查。采用Fisher精确检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。
尿道口前移和龟头成形术修复失败后再次进行管状切开包皮板尿道成形术(n = 14)、尿道口基底皮瓣术(n = 36)和管状切开包皮板尿道成形术(n = 50)的并发症发生率分别为29%(n = 4)、22%(n = 8)和28%(n = 14)(P > 0.05)。总体并发症发生率为26%(n = 26)。18例患者(18%)出现瘘管,5例出现尿道口狭窄(5%),2例出现裂开(2%),1例出现新尿道狭窄(1%)。术后,18例瘘管患者瘘管闭合,5例患者接受尿道口成形术。2例裂开患者和1例新尿道狭窄患者第三次再次进行管状切开包皮板尿道成形术手术失败,他们是复杂尿道下裂修复的候选者(3%)。并发症治疗后管状切开包皮板尿道成形术再次手术的最终成功率为97%。
如果尿道板无瘢痕,管状切开包皮板尿道成形术是尿道下裂再次手术的一种安全有效的替代方法;如果首次尿道下裂修复失败是尿道口基底皮瓣手术,则效果良好。如果尿道板先前已在中线切开,并发症发生率会增加,必须避免第三次再次手术。