Griselli Massimo, McGuirk Simon P, Ko Chung-Sen, Clarke Andrew J B, Barron David J, Brawn William J
Department of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Diana, Princess of Wales Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham B4 6NH, United Kingdom.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Feb;31(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.11.034. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
This study evaluated the results of arterial switch operation and closure of ventricular defects (ASO+VSDc) for double outlet right ventricle with sub-pulmonary ventricular septal defect (Taussig-Bing anomaly).
Between 1988 and 2003, 33 patients (25 male, 76%) with Taussig-Bing anomaly underwent ASO+VSDc (median age 39 days, 1 day-2.1 years). The relationship of the great arteries was antero-posterior (Group I, n=19) or side-by-side (Group II, n=14). Coronary anatomy (Yacoub's classification) was exclusively type A or D in Group I and predominantly type D or E in Group II (64%). Incidence of sub-aortic obstruction and aortic arch obstruction was similar in Group I and II (37% vs 57%, p=0.25 and 84% vs 79%, p=0.98, respectively). Twenty-five patients (76%) had one-stage total correction. Risk factors were analysed using multivariable analysis. Follow-up was complete (median interval of 6.2 years; range, 0.6-15.2 years).
There were three early (9%) and one late death. Actuarial survival was 88+/-6% at 1 and 10 years. There were two early and four late re-operations. Freedom from re-operation was 90+/-5% and 75+/-9% at 1 and 10 years. Four patients required cardiological re-interventions. Freedom from re-intervention at 5 and 10 years was 79+/-9%. On multivariable analysis, complex coronary anatomy (type B and C) was a risk for early mortality (p<0.001) but all other anatomical variables and staged strategy did not influence early or actuarial survival.
The ASO+VSDc approach can be applied to Taussig-Bing anomaly with acceptable mortality and morbidity and it is the procedure of choice at our institution. Anatomical variables did not influence outcomes with this strategy. A staged strategy is still appropriate in complex cases.
本研究评估了动脉调转术加室间隔缺损关闭术(ASO+VSDc)治疗右心室双出口合并肺动脉下室间隔缺损(陶西格-宾氏畸形)的效果。
1988年至2003年间,33例(25例男性,占76%)陶西格-宾氏畸形患者接受了ASO+VSDc手术(中位年龄39天,范围1天至2.1岁)。大动脉关系为前后位(I组,n=19)或并列位(II组,n=14)。I组冠状动脉解剖(亚库布分类)仅为A型或D型,II组主要为D型或E型(64%)。I组和II组主动脉下梗阻和主动脉弓梗阻的发生率相似(分别为37%对57%,p=0.25;84%对79%,p=0.98)。25例患者(76%)接受了一期根治手术。采用多变量分析对危险因素进行分析。随访完整(中位间隔时间6.2年;范围0.6至15.2年)。
有3例早期死亡(9%)和1例晚期死亡。1年和10年的精算生存率分别为88±6%。有2例早期再次手术和4例晚期再次手术。1年和10年免于再次手术的比例分别为90±5%和75±9%。4例患者需要心脏介入治疗。5年和10年免于介入治疗的比例为79±9%。多变量分析显示,复杂冠状动脉解剖(B型和C型)是早期死亡的危险因素(p<0.001),但所有其他解剖变量和分期策略均不影响早期或精算生存率。
ASO+VSDc方法可应用于陶西格-宾氏畸形,死亡率和发病率可接受,是我们机构的首选术式。解剖变量不影响该策略的手术效果。在复杂病例中,分期策略仍然适用。