Perrett C M, McGregor J M, Warwick J, Karran P, Leigh I M, Proby C M, Harwood C A
Centre for Cutaneous Research and Department of Dermatology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Bart's and The London, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Feb;156(2):320-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07616.x.
Organ transplant recipients (OTR) are at high risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancer and premalignant epidermal dysplasia (carcinoma in situ/ Bowen's disease and actinic keratoses). Epidermal dysplasia is often widespread and there are few comparative studies of available treatments.
To compare topical methylaminolaevulinate (MAL) photodynamic therapy (PDT) with topical 5% fluorouracil (5-FU) cream in the treatment of post-transplant epidermal dysplasia.
Eight OTRs with epidermal dysplasia were recruited to an open-label, single-centre, randomized, intrapatient comparative study. Treatment with two cycles of topical MAL PDT 1 week apart was randomly assigned to one area of epidermal dysplasia, and 5-FU cream was applied twice daily for 3 weeks to a clinically and histologically comparable area. Patients were reviewed at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. The main outcome measures were complete resolution rate (CRR), overall reduction in lesional area, treatment-associated pain and erythema, cosmetic outcome and global patient preference.
At all time points evaluated after completion of treatment, PDT was more effective than 5-FU in achieving complete resolution: eight of nine lesional areas cleared with PDT (CRR 89%, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99), compared with one of nine lesional areas treated with 5-FU (CRR 11%, 95% CI: 0.003-0.48) (P = 0.02). The mean lesional area reduction was also proportionately greater with PDT than with 5-FU (100% vs. 79% respectively). Cosmetic outcome and patient preference were also superior in the PDT-treated group.
Compared with topical 5-FU, MAL PDT was a more effective and cosmetically acceptable treatment for epidermal dysplasia in OTRs and was preferred by patients. Further studies are now required to confirm these results and to examine the effect of treating epidermal dysplasia with PDT on subsequent development of squamous cell carcinoma in this high risk population.
器官移植受者(OTR)发生非黑素瘤皮肤癌和癌前表皮发育异常(原位癌/鲍恩病和光化性角化病)的风险很高。表皮发育异常通常广泛存在,而关于现有治疗方法的比较研究较少。
比较局部用甲基氨基酮戊酸(MAL)光动力疗法(PDT)与局部用5%氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)乳膏治疗移植后表皮发育异常的效果。
招募8名患有表皮发育异常的OTR参加一项开放标签、单中心、随机、患者内对照研究。将间隔1周进行两个周期局部MAL PDT治疗随机分配至一个表皮发育异常区域,将5-FU乳膏每日两次涂抹3周于临床和组织学上相当的区域。在治疗后1、3和6个月对患者进行复查。主要结局指标为完全缓解率(CRR)、皮损面积总体减少情况、治疗相关疼痛和红斑、美容效果及患者总体偏好。
在治疗完成后评估的所有时间点,PDT在实现完全缓解方面比5-FU更有效:9个皮损区域中有8个通过PDT清除(CRR 89%,95%CI:0.52 - 0.99),而9个接受5-FU治疗的皮损区域中有1个清除(CRR 11%,95%CI:0.003 - 0.48)(P = 0.02)。PDT使皮损面积的平均减少比例也比5-FU更大(分别为100%和79%)。PDT治疗组的美容效果和患者偏好也更优。
与局部用5-FU相比,MAL PDT是治疗OTR表皮发育异常更有效且美容效果更佳的治疗方法,且更受患者青睐。现在需要进一步研究来证实这些结果,并研究在这一高危人群中用PDT治疗表皮发育异常对后续鳞状细胞癌发生的影响。