Ahmady Shima, Mosterd Klara, Jansen Maud H E, Kelleners-Smeets Nicole W J, Essers Brigitte A B
Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Mar 18;192(4):653-659. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae477.
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used to understand and quantify patient preferences for a variety of treatments, services or screening in order to analyse the choices patients make when faced with different alternatives.
The aim of this DCE was to examine patient preferences for the treatment of Bowen disease.
A DCE was conducted alongside a randomized controlled noninferiority trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical excision, methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) cream as treatments for Bowen disease. Preferences were elicited by presenting patients with choice tasks between surgical excision, MAL-PDT and 5-FU cream with the following attributes: effectiveness, cosmetic outcome, side-effects, treatment duration and process. A mixed logit model was used to account for the panel nature of the data (repeated choices for each respondent) and heterogeneity in preference.
A total of 215 patients completed the DCE. Patients have a clear preference for excision and noninvasive therapies were less valued, as indicated by the large and negative label effect. Both moderate and good-to-excellent cosmetic outcomes were accepted and preferred to poor cosmetic outcomes for all treatments. In addition, none or mild-to-moderate side-effects were considered acceptable and preferred to severe side-effects.
Patients show a clear preference for surgical excision, and of the two noninvasive treatments, 5-FU cream is preferred to MAL-PDT. Treatment choice is also determined by attributes such as effectiveness, cosmetic outcome and side-effects. In the context of shared decision making for Bowen disease, it is important to discuss the elements of treatment that patients value to ensure that an informed decision is made.
离散选择实验(DCEs)越来越多地用于了解和量化患者对各种治疗、服务或筛查的偏好,以便分析患者在面对不同选择时所做出的决定。
本DCE的目的是研究患者对鲍恩病治疗的偏好。
在一项随机对照非劣效性试验中同时进行了DCE,该试验比较了手术切除、甲基氨基乙酰丙酸光动力疗法(MAL-PDT)和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)乳膏治疗鲍恩病的有效性。通过向患者呈现手术切除、MAL-PDT和5-FU乳膏之间的选择任务来引出偏好,这些选择任务具有以下属性:有效性、美容效果、副作用、治疗持续时间和治疗过程。使用混合逻辑模型来考虑数据的面板性质(每个受访者的重复选择)和偏好的异质性。
共有215名患者完成了DCE。患者对切除有明显偏好,无创治疗的价值较低,这由较大的负标签效应表明。所有治疗的中度以及良好至优秀的美容效果都被接受且优于较差的美容效果。此外,无副作用或轻度至中度副作用被认为是可接受的,且优于严重副作用。
患者对手术切除表现出明显偏好,在两种无创治疗中,5-FU乳膏优于MAL-PDT。治疗选择还由有效性、美容效果和副作用等属性决定。在鲍恩病的共同决策背景下,讨论患者重视的治疗要素以确保做出明智的决定非常重要。