Di Felice Roberto, Rappelli Giorgio, Camaioni Emanuele, Cattani Maria, Meyer Jean-Marc, Belser Urs C
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Feb;18(1):108-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01299.x.
The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate, on ITI solid abutments, the retention values of single crowns fabricated using an alternative prosthetic solution: secondary cast superstructure luted to an electroformed primary coping.
Fifty standard 4.1 mm ITI implants and 5.5 mm high ITI machined abutments were assembled and mounted in acrylic resin. Implant/abutment assemblies were randomly divided into two groups. In the test group, primary galvanic caps were directly fabricated on implant abutments (A.G.C. Micro machine), and a secondary cast noble alloy superstructure was luted on each primary galvanic cap with a resin cement (Nimetic Cem). In the control group, prefabricated burn-out caps were used for casting the metal frameworks. Test and control crowns were cemented using a resin cement (Panavia 21). After storage at 37 degrees for 24 h, the specimens were subjected to a pull-out test using an Instron universal testing machine. The load required to dislodge each sample and the respective mode of failure were recorded. Means and standard deviations of loads at failure were analyzed using ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at P< or =0.05.
The retention values (+/-SD) of loads at failure were 67.26 (+/-16.61) for the test group and 44.03 (+/-9.45) for the control group. In the test group no separation occurred between the electroformed (galvanic) primary cap and the secondary superstructure.
The results showed that this prosthetic solution is superior on retentive performance than the conventional cast framework. An added clinical advantage of this novel method is its potential to provide a totally passive fit. Further in vitro and in vivo studies involving multiple-unit restorations are needed in order to more generally validate this prosthetic concept.
本体外研究旨在调查在ITI实心基台上,使用一种替代性修复解决方案制作的单冠的固位值:将二次铸造的上部结构粘结到电铸的初次内冠上。
组装50个标准的4.1毫米ITI种植体和5.5毫米高的ITI加工基台,并将其安装在丙烯酸树脂中。种植体/基台组件随机分为两组。在试验组中,直接在种植体基台上制作初次电铸帽(A.G.C.微型机器),并使用树脂粘结剂(Nimetic Cem)将二次铸造的贵金属合金上部结构粘结到每个初次电铸帽上。在对照组中,使用预制的烧尽帽来铸造金属框架。试验组和对照组的冠均使用树脂粘结剂(Panavia 21)粘结。在37℃下储存24小时后,使用Instron万能试验机对标本进行拔出试验。记录使每个样本脱位所需的载荷以及各自的失效模式。使用方差分析分析失效时载荷的均值和标准差。设定统计学显著性为P≤0.05。
试验组失效时载荷的固位值(±标准差)为67.26(±16.61),对照组为44.03(±9.45)。在试验组中,电铸(电铸)初次帽与二次上部结构之间未发生分离。
结果表明,这种修复解决方案在固位性能上优于传统铸造框架。这种新方法的另一个临床优势是其有可能提供完全被动就位。为了更全面地验证这种修复概念,需要进一步进行涉及多单位修复体的体外和体内研究。