Swetter Susan M, Soon Seaver, Harrington Cynthia R, Chen Suephy C
Dermatology Services, VA Health Care Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Arch Dermatol. 2007 Jan;143(1):30-6. doi: 10.1001/archderm.143.1.30.
To compare the effect of differing health care delivery models, specifically, gatekeeper (GK) vs direct access (DA) routes, on melanoma outcome as measured by tumor thickness and cancer stage at diagnosis.
Retrospective medical record review of patients previously diagnosed as having cutaneous melanoma who were referred to a university-based clinic from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2000.
Stanford Pigmented Lesion and Cutaneous Melanoma Clinic, Stanford, Calif. Patients Two hundred thirty-four patients with primary melanoma stratified according to health care access route (GK or DA).
Differences in Breslow thickness, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, histologic features, patient delay in seeking medical attention, and physician delay in diagnosis (time between initial physician visit and diagnostic biopsy procedure).
Of 234 patients, 168 (72%) were referred through the DA route and 66 (28%) through the GK route. A significant association was found between physician delay and access route; patients in the DA group underwent biopsy sooner (< or =3 months vs >3 months) than those in the GK group (P<.001). No significant difference was observed in stage at diagnosis (predominantly stage IA), proportion of nodular melanoma (DA 4% vs GK 2%), patient delay, or median tumor thickness between DA and GK routes (0.42 mm vs 0.50 mm, respectively). A trend toward a greater proportion of histologically ulcerated melanoma was observed in the DA group compared with the GK group (12% vs 5%, respectively; P = .06).
This pilot study demonstrated no difference in outcome between GK and DA routes as measured by melanoma thickness and stage, although patients in the DA group underwent diagnostic biopsy sooner than those in the GK group. The potential effect of health care models on melanoma outcomes merits further study.
比较不同医疗服务模式,特别是把关人(GK)模式与直接就诊(DA)模式,对黑色素瘤诊断时肿瘤厚度和癌症分期所衡量的结局的影响。
对1996年1月1日至2000年12月31日转诊至一家大学诊所的既往诊断为皮肤黑色素瘤的患者进行回顾性病历审查。
加利福尼亚州斯坦福市斯坦福色素沉着病变与皮肤黑色素瘤诊所。患者234例原发性黑色素瘤患者,根据医疗服务获取途径(GK或DA)分层。
Breslow厚度、美国癌症联合委员会分期、组织学特征、患者就医延迟时间以及医生诊断延迟时间(从首次就诊到诊断性活检的时间)的差异。
234例患者中,168例(72%)通过DA途径转诊,66例(28%)通过GK途径转诊。发现医生诊断延迟与就诊途径之间存在显著关联;DA组患者比GK组患者更早接受活检(≤3个月对>3个月)(P<0.001)。在诊断分期(主要为IA期)、结节性黑色素瘤比例(DA组4%对GK组2%)、患者延迟或DA和GK途径之间的肿瘤中位数厚度(分别为0.42mm对0.50mm)方面未观察到显著差异。与GK组相比,DA组组织学溃疡型黑色素瘤的比例有增加趋势(分别为12%对5%;P = 0.06)。
这项初步研究表明,以黑色素瘤厚度和分期衡量,GK和DA途径的结局无差异,尽管DA组患者比GK组患者更早接受诊断性活检。医疗服务模式对黑色素瘤结局的潜在影响值得进一步研究。