Easterbrooks Susan R, Stephenson Brenda, Mertens Donna
Department of Educational Psychology and Special Education, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Am Ann Deaf. 2006 Fall;151(4):398-409. doi: 10.1353/aad.2006.0044.
Under a grant to improve outcomes for students who are deaf or hard of hearing awarded to the Association of College Educators--Deaf/Hard of Hearing, a team identified content that all teachers of students who are deaf and hard of hearing must understand and be able to teach. Also identified were 20 practices associated with content standards (10 each, literacy and science/mathematics). Thirty-seven master teachers identified by grant agents rated the practices on a Likert-type scale indicating the maximum benefit of each practice and maximum likelihood that they would use the practice, yielding a likelihood-impact analysis. The teachers showed strong agreement on the benefits and likelihood of use of the rated practices. Concerns about implementation of many of the practices related to time constraints and mixed-ability classrooms were themes of the reviews. Actions for teacher preparation programs were recommended.
在授予聋人/重听学生学院教育者协会的一项旨在改善聋人或重听学生学习成果的拨款项目下,一个团队确定了所有聋人和重听学生教师必须理解并能够教授的内容。同时还确定了与内容标准相关的20种做法(读写和科学/数学各10种)。拨款机构确定的37名骨干教师按照李克特量表对这些做法进行了评分,表明每种做法的最大益处以及他们使用该做法的最大可能性,从而得出可能性-影响分析。教师们对所评做法的益处和使用可能性表现出强烈的共识。关于许多做法在实施过程中与时间限制和混合能力课堂相关的担忧是评论的主题。文中还推荐了针对教师培训项目的行动。