Patient perception of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
作者信息
Callus Thérèse
机构信息
School of Law, University of Reading, UK.
出版信息
Med Law Rev. 2007 Spring;15(1):62-85. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwl021. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
PMID:17227798
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Patient perception of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
Med Law Rev. 2007 Spring;15(1):62-85. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwl021. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
2
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority: evidence based policy formation in a contested context.
Health Care Anal. 2004 Mar;12(1):1-6. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000026721.01758.e1.
3
The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
Mod Law Rev. 1985 Jan;48(1):73-85.
4
Call to strengthen UK ban on human clones.
Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1917. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60416-3.
5
The power to choose.
New Sci. 2005;186(2494):17.
6
UK public consulted on ethics of human cloning.
Lancet. 1998 Feb 7;351(9100):427. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78376-8.
7
Legal responses to some of the new developments in reproductive technologies. Part 1.
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2001;7(2):28-37. doi: 10.1179/hrge.7.2.n9336m3412326356.
8
WHAT ROLE SHOULD PUBLIC OPINION PLAY IN ETHICO-LEGAL DECISION MAKING? THE EXAMPLE OF SELECTING SEX FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS USING PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS.
Med Law Rev. 2016 Winter;24(1):34-58. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwv046. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
9
UK consults public on clones for research.
Nature. 1998 Feb 5;391(6667):523. doi: 10.1038/35222.
10
New techniques in the field of human fertilization and embryology.
Hum Reprod. 1986 Jun;1(4):271-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Comparing the burden: what can we learn by comparing regulatory frameworks in abortion and fertility services?
Health Care Anal. 2013 Dec;21(4):338-54. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0196-6.
2
Canada's approach to conflict- of-interest oversight.
CMAJ. 2007 Aug 14;177(4):375-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1070077.
Zotero 插件