Dawson Angus
Centre for Professional Ethics, Keele Hall, Keele University, Staffs, United Kingdom.
Health Care Anal. 2004 Mar;12(1):1-6. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000026721.01758.e1.
This article briefly reviews the various papers contained in this volume. They were originally presented at a research work shop held at Keele University in the UK in February 2003. It is suggested that the different papers raise a series of related legal, social and ethical issues and can be collectively seen to demonstrate the fact that policy formation in relation to reproductive matters is highly contested. It is concluded that ethical policy formation in this area needs to be based on actual evidence of harm rather than assumed harm and that this therefore entails more empirical research into reproductive matters.
本文简要回顾了本卷中包含的各类论文。这些论文最初是在2003年2月于英国基尔大学举办的一次研究研讨会上发表的。有人认为,不同的论文提出了一系列相关的法律、社会和伦理问题,并且可以共同被视为表明了这样一个事实,即与生殖问题相关的政策制定存在高度争议。得出的结论是,这一领域的伦理政策制定需要基于实际的危害证据而非假定的危害,因此这需要对生殖问题进行更多的实证研究。