Riehmann M, Bruskewitz R
Division of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
J Androl. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):415-22.
Transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) is compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) by reviewing nonrandomized, matched, and randomized studies. These studies indicate that incision of the prostate and bladder neck relieves outflow urinary obstruction, as does TURP. The incision is relatively easier to learn and perform, and requires shorter operative time compared to TURP. The incidence of retrograde ejaculation is lower after incision than after TURP--16% versus 63%, on average. Transurethral incision of the prostate has a potential for reduced costs due to reduced operative time, shortened hospital stay, and the potential for local anesthesia.
通过回顾非随机、匹配和随机研究，对经尿道前列腺切开术（TUIP）与经尿道前列腺切除术（TURP）进行了比较。这些研究表明，前列腺和膀胱颈切开术可缓解尿路梗阻，TURP也是如此。与TURP相比，该切开术相对更容易学习和操作，且手术时间更短。切开术后逆行射精的发生率低于TURP术后——平均分别为16%和63%。由于手术时间缩短、住院时间缩短以及可采用局部麻醉，经尿道前列腺切开术有可能降低成本。
