Ward Marcia M, Jaana Mirou, Bahensky James A, Vartak Smruti, Wakefield Douglas S
Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Dr, E210GH, Iowa City 52242, USA.
J Med Syst. 2006 Dec;30(6):429-38. doi: 10.1007/s10916-006-9014-3.
Clinical information systems (CIS) capture clinical data to support more efficient and effective decision making and clinical care delivery. Only a few estimates of CIS availability and use in hospitals are available nationally. The purpose of the current research is to examine differences in CIS availability and use between urban and rural hospitals. A survey addressing this purpose was completed by 74 (63.7%) of Iowa hospitals. Rural hospitals lag behind urban hospitals in terms of many CIS applications. More than 80% of the urban hospitals, but only between 30 and 40% of the rural hospitals, reported using computers to collect basic clinical information for potential use in an electronic medical record (EMR) and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system. Comparison of CIS within one state's urban and rural hospitals sheds light on variation in clinical support applications, decision support, and electronic medical record "readiness" in these settings.
临床信息系统(CIS)收集临床数据,以支持更高效、有效的决策制定和临床护理服务。目前全国范围内仅有少数关于医院中临床信息系统可用性和使用情况的估计数据。当前研究的目的是调查城乡医院在临床信息系统可用性和使用方面的差异。爱荷华州74家(63.7%)医院完成了一项针对此目的的调查。在许多临床信息系统应用方面,农村医院落后于城市医院。超过80%的城市医院报告称使用计算机收集基本临床信息,以备在电子病历(EMR)和计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)系统中潜在使用,而农村医院的这一比例仅在30%至40%之间。对一个州内城乡医院的临床信息系统进行比较,有助于了解这些环境中临床支持应用、决策支持和电子病历“就绪”情况的差异。