Pilgård Göran, Rosenquist Jan, Söderfeldt Björn
Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Sweden.
Swed Dent J. 2006;30(3):117-22.
The aim of this study was to investigate if the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) clinics in Sweden actively work with quality development and if so, which systems they use. A further aim was to explore the opinion of the employees about quality work. Data were collected by way of a questionnaire with 67 questions, related to quality management at the clinic and to the content of healthy work. 22 clinics with 297 employees responded, 65% of the clinics and 86% of the employees. More than half of the respondents stated that they worked with a management system, but there was uncertainty as to the type of a quality system. Only at two clinics, all the respondents agreed on the system. This showed that one of the most important aspects in a quality system, i.e. to inform everyone, was unsatisfactory. The study showed that dental nurses and assistant nurses were more appreciative of quality as a tool for improvement than the maxillo-facial surgeons. There was no such difference concerning the importance of quality work. Dental nurses thought that the quality was more important for the working situation concerning the physical environment than did the maxillo-facial surgeons.
本研究的目的是调查瑞典口腔颌面外科(OMFS)诊所是否积极开展质量改进工作,若有,他们使用何种体系。另一目的是探究员工对质量工作的看法。通过一份包含67个问题的问卷收集数据,这些问题涉及诊所的质量管理以及健康工作的内容。22家诊所的297名员工做出了回应,占诊所总数的65%,员工总数的86%。超过半数的受访者表示他们采用了一种管理体系,但对于质量体系的类型存在不确定性。只有两家诊所的所有受访者对体系达成了一致。这表明质量体系中最重要的方面之一,即告知每一个人,做得并不令人满意。研究表明,与颌面外科医生相比,牙科护士和助理护士更将质量视为改进的工具。在质量工作的重要性方面不存在这种差异。牙科护士认为,相较于颌面外科医生,质量对于工作场所的物理环境更为重要。