Suppr超能文献

局限性前列腺癌治疗的副作用:患者和健康对照对其的重视程度是否不同?

Side-effects of treatment for localized prostate cancer: are they valued differently by patients and healthy controls?

作者信息

Korfage Ida J, de Koning Harry J, Habbema J Dik F, Schröder Fritz H, Essink-Bot Marie-Louise

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):801-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06707.x. Epub 2007 Jan 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine how men treated for localized prostate cancer and who had permanent side-effects, and healthy controls, would value five descriptions of health states associated with side-effects of treatment for localized prostate cancer, hypothesising that patients would value the health states as less detrimental than men with no prostate cancer.

PATIENTS, SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In previous research, patients with prostate cancer reported high generic quality-of-life scores after primary treatment, despite side-effects; it was suggested that these patients accepted the side-effects, i.e. urinary, bowel and sexual dysfunction, as 'part of the bargain' because they felt they were saved from a life-threatening disease. Thus, we asked 54 men who had been treated for localized prostate cancer and had permanent side-effects, and 53 healthy controls, to value five descriptions of health states. All respondents valued all descriptions using two valuation methods, a visual analogue scale (VAS, range 0-100) and time trade-off (TTO, range 0-1). The respondent functioning was assessed using the EuroQol-5D, completed with items on urinary, bowel and sexual function.

RESULTS

Patients and healthy controls had similar valuations for nine of the 10 comparisons (five health states by two methods). Valuations in both groups resulted in the same ranking order of states on the TTO and one exchange in rank order on the VAS.

CONCLUSIONS

When asked to value five health states associated with side-effects of treatment for localized prostate cancer, there was no difference in the valuation of erectile, urinary and bowel dysfunction between patients with permanent side-effects after treatment and healthy controls. More likely explanations for the high generic quality-of-life scores after primary treatment for prostate cancer are a response shift and insensitivity of generic health-related quality-of-life measures.

摘要

目的

确定接受局限性前列腺癌治疗且有永久性副作用的男性以及健康对照者如何评价与局限性前列腺癌治疗副作用相关的五种健康状态描述,假设患者会认为这些健康状态的损害程度低于无前列腺癌的男性。

患者、受试者与方法:在先前的研究中,前列腺癌患者尽管有副作用,但在初次治疗后报告了较高的一般生活质量得分;有人认为这些患者将泌尿、肠道和性功能障碍等副作用视为“交易的一部分”接受了,因为他们觉得自己从危及生命的疾病中被拯救了。因此,我们让54名接受过局限性前列腺癌治疗且有永久性副作用的男性和53名健康对照者对五种健康状态描述进行评价。所有受访者使用两种评价方法对所有描述进行评价,即视觉模拟量表(VAS,范围0 - 100)和时间权衡法(TTO,范围0 - 1)。使用欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol - 5D)评估受访者的功能,并填写有关泌尿、肠道和性功能的项目。

结果

在10项比较中的9项(通过两种方法对5种健康状态进行比较)中,患者和健康对照者的评价相似。两组在TTO上对健康状态的排序相同,在VAS上有一个排序交换。

结论

当被要求对与局限性前列腺癌治疗副作用相关的五种健康状态进行评价时,治疗后有永久性副作用的患者与健康对照者在勃起、泌尿和肠道功能障碍的评价上没有差异。前列腺癌初次治疗后一般生活质量得分较高的更可能解释是反应转移和一般健康相关生活质量测量方法的不敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验