• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性与男性缺血性中风的遗传度比较:一项遗传流行病学研究。

Heritability of ischaemic stroke in women compared with men: a genetic epidemiological study.

作者信息

Touzé Emmanuel, Rothwell Peter M

机构信息

Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70683-4.

DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70683-4
PMID:17239799
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ischaemic stroke is partly heritable. However, although the genetic and non-genetic factors responsible could be sex-specific, interactions between the sex of the parent affected and the sex of the proband or affected siblings are unknown. We sought to assess the relation between the sex and phenotype of affected probands and the sex of affected first-degree relatives.

METHODS

We determined the prevalence of history of stroke in the mother, father, and other first-degree relatives in female and male probands with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in the population-based Oxford Vascular Study (OXVASC). We validated our findings using unpublished individual patient data from two independent Oxford studies.

FINDINGS

In OXVASC, detailed family history was available in 806 (93%) probands. Female probands were more likely than males to have at least one affected first-degree relative (146/423 vs 104/383; OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-2.0, p=0.02) due entirely to an excess of affected female relatives in female probands (female relative vs male relative OR=1.7, 1.3-2.4, p=0.0004; female only vs male only OR=2.1, 1.4-3.1, p=0.0001). Maternal stroke was more common than paternal stroke in female probands (OR=1.8, 1.2-2.7, p=0.001) but not in males (OR=1.1, 0.7-1.7, p=0.38), and female probands were more likely than males to have an affected sister (OR=3.1, 1.5-6.7, p=0.004) but not an affected brother (OR=1.1, 0.6-2.1, p=0.80). Ages at first stroke were also correlated within families among affected females (r=0.36, p=0.004) but not among affected males, such that the excess of affected female relatives of female probands was greatest when the difference in age at first stroke was less than 5 years (OR=3.7, 1.6-8.6, p=0.0007) and fell as the age difference increased (p for trend=0.004). These findings were independent of traditional risk factors and stroke subtype. Data from the other Oxford studies confirmed the excess maternal history of stroke in female probands (OR=2.3, 1.5-3.8, p<0.00001) and the lack in males (OR=1.0, 0.7-1.4, p=0.58).

INTERPRETATION

Heritability of ischaemic stroke is greater in women than in men, with an excess of affected mothers and affected sisters in female probands independent of traditional vascular risk factors, which could be explained by sex-specific genetic, epigenetic, or non-genetic mechanisms.

摘要

背景

缺血性中风具有部分遗传性。然而,尽管相关的遗传和非遗传因素可能存在性别差异,但受影响父母的性别与先证者或受影响兄弟姐妹的性别之间的相互作用尚不清楚。我们试图评估受影响先证者的性别和表型与受影响一级亲属的性别之间的关系。

方法

在基于人群的牛津血管研究(OXVASC)中,我们确定了患有缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的女性和男性先证者的母亲、父亲及其他一级亲属的中风病史患病率。我们使用来自两项独立牛津研究的未发表的个体患者数据对我们的发现进行了验证。

研究结果

在OXVASC中,806名(93%)先证者有详细的家族史。女性先证者比男性先证者更有可能至少有一名受影响的一级亲属(146/423对104/383;比值比1.4,95%置信区间1.1 - 2.0,p = 0.02),这完全是由于女性先证者中受影响的女性亲属过多(女性亲属与男性亲属相比,比值比 = 1.7,1.3 - 2.4,p = 0.0004;仅女性受影响与仅男性受影响相比,比值比 = 2.1,1.4 - 3.1,p = 0.0001)。在女性先证者中,母亲中风比父亲中风更常见(比值比 = 1.8,1.2 - 2.7,p = 0.001),而在男性先证者中并非如此(比值比 = 1.1,0.7 - 1.7,p = 0.38),并且女性先证者比男性先证者更有可能有受影响的姐妹(比值比 = 3.1,1.5 - 6.7,p = 0.004),但不太可能有受影响的兄弟(比值比 = 1.1,0.6 - 2.1,p = 0.80)。首次中风的年龄在受影响的女性家庭成员之间也具有相关性(r = 0.36,p = 0.

相似文献

1
Heritability of ischaemic stroke in women compared with men: a genetic epidemiological study.女性与男性缺血性中风的遗传度比较:一项遗传流行病学研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70683-4.
2
Sex differences in heritability of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.缺血性中风遗传力的性别差异:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2008 Jan;39(1):16-23. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.484618. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
3
Familial history of stroke is associated with acute coronary syndromes in women.中风家族史与女性急性冠状动脉综合征相关。
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011 Feb;4(1):9-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.957688. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
4
Family history does not predict angiographic localization or severity of coronary artery disease.家族史不能预测冠状动脉疾病的血管造影定位或严重程度。
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Apr;221(2):451-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.01.033. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
5
Sex-specific familial clustering of myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠脉综合征患者中心肌梗死的性别特异性家族聚集性。
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009 Apr;2(2):98-105. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.806562. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
6
Relative familial clustering of cerebral versus coronary ischemic events.脑缺血事件与冠状动脉缺血事件的相对家族聚集性。
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011 Aug 1;4(4):390-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.959114. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
7
Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic transient ischaemic attack and non-disabling stroke at older ages: a population-based study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.在年龄较大的隐源性短暂性脑缺血发作和非致残性卒中患者中卵圆孔未闭的患病率:基于人群的研究、系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Jul;17(7):609-617. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30167-4. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
Genetic predisposition to stroke in relatives of hypertensives.高血压患者亲属患中风的遗传易感性。
Stroke. 2000 Feb;31(2):487-92. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.2.487.
9
Genetic liability to epilepsy in Kerala State, India.印度喀拉拉邦癫痫的遗传易感性。
Epilepsy Res. 2004 Dec;62(2-3):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2004.08.007.
10
Incidence and prevalence of dementia associated with transient ischaemic attack and stroke: analysis of the population-based Oxford Vascular Study.与短暂性脑缺血发作和中风相关的痴呆症的发病率和患病率:基于人群的牛津血管研究分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Mar;18(3):248-258. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30442-3. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Family history of stroke - a useful clue for the primary care physician and stroke neurologist: a narrative review.中风家族史——初级保健医生和中风神经科医生的有用线索:一项叙述性综述
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2023 Mar;32(1):31-39. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2023.126482. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
2
Sex-Associated Differences in Neurovascular Dysfunction During Ischemic Stroke.缺血性中风期间神经血管功能障碍的性别差异
Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Apr 1;15:860959. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.860959. eCollection 2022.
3
Targets of Vitamin C With Therapeutic Potential for Cardiovascular Disease and Underlying Mechanisms: A Study of Network Pharmacology.
具有心血管疾病治疗潜力的维生素C靶点及其潜在机制:网络药理学研究
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Feb 2;11:591337. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.591337. eCollection 2020.
4
Cardiovascular Disease, Aging, and Clonal Hematopoiesis.心血管疾病、衰老与克隆性造血
Annu Rev Pathol. 2020 Jan 24;15:419-438. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032544. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
Family History and Stroke Risk in China: Evidence from a Large Cohort Study.中国的家族病史与中风风险:来自一项大型队列研究的证据。
J Stroke. 2017 May;19(2):188-195. doi: 10.5853/jos.2016.01270. Epub 2017 May 31.
6
Differences in Common Genetic Predisposition to Ischemic Stroke by Age and Sex.不同年龄和性别的缺血性中风常见遗传易感性差异。
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3042-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009816. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
7
Sex Differences in Stroke Subtypes, Severity, Risk Factors, and Outcomes among Elderly Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.老年急性缺血性卒中患者卒中亚型、严重程度、危险因素及预后的性别差异
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Sep 8;7:174. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00174. eCollection 2015.
8
Mitochondrial DNA haplogroups and short-term neurological outcomes of ischemic stroke.线粒体DNA单倍群与缺血性中风的短期神经学预后
Sci Rep. 2015 May 20;5:9864. doi: 10.1038/srep09864.
9
Stroke patients' knowledge about cardiovascular family history - the Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study (NOR-SYS).中风患者对心血管家族史的了解——挪威青年中风研究(NOR-SYS)
BMC Neurol. 2015 Mar 12;15:30. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0276-6.
10
The Oxford Renal (OxRen) cross-sectional study of chronic kidney disease in the UK.英国牛津肾脏病(OxRen)横断面研究慢性肾脏病。
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 17;3(12):e004265. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004265.