Nascimento Danielle C, Andersen Monica L, Hipólide Débora Cristina, Nobrega José N, Tufik Sergio
Department of Psychobiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP/EPM), R. Napoleão de Barros, 925, V. Clementino 04024-002, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Mar 28;178(2):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.12.016. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
Previous studies have established a relationship between sleep disruption and pain, and it has been suggested that hyperalgesia induced by paradoxical sleep deprivation (PSD) could be due to a reduction of opioidergic neurotransmission in the brain. In the present study rats deprived of sleep for 96 h as well as rats allowed to recover for 24h after PSD and normal controls received vehicle or morphine (2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and were tested on a hot plate 1h later. Quantitative receptor autoradiography was used to map alterations in binding to brain mu-opioid receptors in separate groups. Results demonstrated that PSD induced a significant reduction in thermal pain threshold, as measured by paw withdrawal latencies. This effect did not return to baseline control values after 24h of sleep recovery. The usual analgesic effect of morphine was observed in the control group but not in PSD or rebound groups except at the highest dose (10 mg/kg). Binding of [3H]DAMGO to mu sites did not differ significantly among the three groups in any of the 33 brain regions examined. These results do not exclude the participation of the opioid system in PSD-induced pain hypersensitivity since sleep-deprived rats were clearly resistant to morphine. However, the fact no changes were seen in [3H]DAMGO binding indicates that mechanisms other than altered mu-opioid binding must be sought to explain the phenomenon.
先前的研究已经证实了睡眠中断与疼痛之间的关系,并且有人提出,异相睡眠剥夺(PSD)所诱发的痛觉过敏可能是由于大脑中阿片能神经传递的减少所致。在本研究中,将大鼠睡眠剥夺96小时,以及在PSD后使其恢复24小时的大鼠和正常对照组,分别给予溶剂或吗啡(2.5、5和10毫克/千克,腹腔注射),并在1小时后在热板上进行测试。采用定量受体放射自显影技术来描绘不同组中与脑μ-阿片受体结合的变化情况。结果表明,通过爪部退缩潜伏期测量,PSD导致热痛阈值显著降低。睡眠恢复24小时后,这种效应并未恢复到基线对照值。在对照组中观察到了吗啡通常的镇痛效果,但在PSD组或恢复组中,除了最高剂量(10毫克/千克)外,均未观察到该效果。在所检测的33个脑区中的任何一个,[3H]DAMGO与μ位点的结合在三组之间均无显著差异。这些结果并不排除阿片系统参与PSD诱导的疼痛超敏反应,因为睡眠剥夺的大鼠对吗啡明显耐药。然而,[3H]DAMGO结合未见变化这一事实表明,必须寻找除μ-阿片结合改变之外的机制来解释这一现象。