Warren Oliver, Alexiou Christos, Massey Rachel, Leff Daniel, Purkayastha Sanjay, Kinross James, Darzi Ara, Athanasiou Thanos
Department of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, UK.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):665-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.034. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
It is known that cardiopulmonary bypass causes an inflammatory reaction with an associated morbidity and mortality. Several anti-inflammatory strategies have been implemented to reduce this response, including leukocyte removal from the circulation using specialised filters. The aim of this study is to systematically review the available evidence on leukocyte filtration in cardiac surgery, focusing on its effect on systemic inflammation and whether this has influenced clinical outcomes. Five electronic databases were systematically searched for studies reporting the effect of leukocyte filtration at any point within the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit in humans. Reference lists of all identified studies were checked for any missing publications. Two authors independently extracted the data from the included studies. Whilst systemic leukodepleting filters do not appear to consistently lower leukocyte counts, they may preferentially remove activated leukocytes. Small improvements in early post-operative lung function in patients receiving systemic leukodepletion have been reported, but this does not lead to reduced hospital stay or decreased mortality. There is substantial evidence that cardioplegic leukocyte filtration attenuates the reperfusion injury at a cellular level, but this has not been translated into clinical improvements. Finally, whilst various strategies involving multiple leukocyte filters, or the incorporation of pharmacological agents into leukocyte-depleting protocols have been evaluated, the current available results are not conclusive. Our study suggests that there is not enough high quality or consistent evidence to draw guidelines regarding the use of leukocyte-depleting filters within routine cardiac surgical practice.
已知体外循环会引发炎症反应,并伴有一定的发病率和死亡率。已经实施了几种抗炎策略来减轻这种反应,包括使用专门的过滤器从循环中去除白细胞。本研究的目的是系统评价心脏手术中白细胞滤过的现有证据,重点关注其对全身炎症的影响以及这是否影响了临床结果。系统检索了五个电子数据库,以查找报告白细胞滤过在人体体外循环回路中任何点的作用的研究。检查所有已识别研究的参考文献列表,以查找任何遗漏的出版物。两位作者独立从纳入研究中提取数据。虽然全身性白细胞去除过滤器似乎并不能持续降低白细胞计数,但它们可能会优先去除活化的白细胞。有报道称,接受全身性白细胞去除的患者术后早期肺功能有小幅改善,但这并未导致住院时间缩短或死亡率降低。有大量证据表明,心脏停搏液白细胞滤过在细胞水平上减轻了再灌注损伤,但这尚未转化为临床改善。最后,虽然已经评估了涉及多个白细胞过滤器的各种策略,或将药物制剂纳入白细胞去除方案,但目前可得的结果尚无定论。我们的研究表明,没有足够的高质量或一致的证据来制定关于在常规心脏手术实践中使用白细胞去除过滤器的指南。