Suppr超能文献

体外循环期间的在线白细胞滤过。一项随机前瞻性试验的临床结果。

In-line leukocyte filtration during bypass. Clinical results from a randomized prospective trial.

作者信息

Lust R M, Bode A P, Yang L, Hodges W, Chitwood W R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenvile, North Carolina 27858-4354, USA.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 1996 Sep-Oct;42(5):M819-22.

PMID:8944997
Abstract

Leukocyte mediated pulmonary injury may delay recovery after cardiac surgery, and leukocyte depletion during bypass has been suggested. Two groups of patients were randomly, prospectively assigned from 50 sequential patients to undergo open heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass, either with (n = 25) or without (n = 25) leukocyte filters. The two groups were not significantly different regarding age, gender, race, pre-operative ejection fraction, pump time, or cross-clamp time. Post operative arterial blood gases (pO2: 173 +/- 66 vs 192 +/- 107; pCO2: 30.2 +/- 8.2 vs 30.8 +/- 8.0), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR 105 +/- 45 vs 112 +/- 50 dyne cm-5), time on ventilator (17.8 +/- 6.4 vs 19.7 +/- 8.6 hr), and length of hospital stay (7.65 +/- 4.57 vs 8.52 +/- 5.87 days) were not different between groups (mean +/- SD, with vs without filters, respectively). Arterial oxygenation was somewhat poorer, and PVR was somewhat lower in the leukocyte filtered group. However, these trends did not produce significant decreases in total ventilator time or length of hospital stay. In-line filtration did remove leukocytes, but did not reduce circulating leukocyte count. In effect, leukocyte filtration produced an effective leukocyte concentration at the filter site. These data do not support routine incorporation of in-line leukocyte filtration during bypass.

摘要

白细胞介导的肺损伤可能会延迟心脏手术后的恢复,因此有人建议在体外循环期间进行白细胞清除。从50例连续接受心脏直视手术并使用体外循环的患者中随机、前瞻性地分为两组,一组(n = 25)使用白细胞过滤器,另一组(n = 25)不使用白细胞过滤器。两组在年龄、性别、种族、术前射血分数、体外循环时间或主动脉阻断时间方面无显著差异。术后动脉血气分析(pO2:173±66 vs 192±107;pCO2:30.2±8.2 vs 30.8±8.0)、肺血管阻力(PVR 105±45 vs 112±50达因·厘米⁻⁵)、呼吸机使用时间(17.8±6.4 vs 19.7±8.6小时)和住院时间(7.65±4.57 vs 8.52±5.87天)在两组之间无差异(均值±标准差,分别为使用过滤器组和未使用过滤器组)。白细胞过滤组的动脉氧合稍差,肺血管阻力稍低。然而,这些趋势并未显著减少总呼吸机使用时间或住院时间。在线过滤确实能去除白细胞,但并未降低循环白细胞计数。实际上,白细胞过滤在过滤器部位产生了有效的白细胞浓度。这些数据不支持在体外循环期间常规使用在线白细胞过滤。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验