Silvestri L, van Saene H K F, Milanese M, Gregori D, Gullo A
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Presidio Ospedaliero, Gorizia, Italy.
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Mar;65(3):187-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.10.014. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) was undertaken to evaluate the impact of this procedure on bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality. Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, previous meta-analyses, and conference proceedings, without restriction of language or publication status. RCTs were retrieved that compared oropharyngeal and/or intestinal administration of antibiotics as part of the SDD protocol, with or without a parenteral component, with no treatment or placebo in the controls. The three outcome measures were patients with bloodstream infection, causative micro-organisms, and total mortality. Fifty-one RCTs conducted between 1987 and 2005, comprising 8065 critically ill patients were included in the review; 4079 patients received SDD and 3986 were controls. SDD significantly reduced overall bloodstream infections [odds ratio (OR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59-0.90; P=0.0036], gram-negative bloodstream infections (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.63; P<0.001) and overall mortality (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94; P=0.0064), without affecting gram-positive bloodstream infections (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.47). The subgroup analysis showed an even larger impact of SDD using parenteral and enteral antimicrobials on overall bloodstream infections, bloodstream infections due to gram-negative bacteria and overall mortality with ORs of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.46-0.87; P=0.005), 0.30 (95% CI, 0.16-0.56; P<0.001), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61-0.91; P=0.0034), respectively. Twenty patients need to be treated with SDD to prevent one gram-negative bloodstream infection and 22 patients to prevent one death.
我们进行了一项关于消化道选择性去污(SDD)随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估该程序对细菌性血流感染和死亡率的影响。数据来源包括Medline、Embase、Cochrane对照试验注册库、以往的荟萃分析以及会议论文集,不受语言或出版状态的限制。检索到的RCT将作为SDD方案一部分的抗生素经口咽和/或肠道给药(有或无肠外给药成分)与对照组的无治疗或安慰剂进行了比较。三个结局指标为血流感染患者、致病微生物和总死亡率。该评价纳入了1987年至2005年间进行的51项RCT,共8065例危重症患者;4079例患者接受了SDD,3986例为对照组。SDD显著降低了总体血流感染[比值比(OR),0.73;95%置信区间(CI),0.59 - 0.90;P = 0.0036]、革兰阴性菌血流感染(OR,0.39;95% CI,0.24 - 0.63;P < 0.001)和总体死亡率(OR,0.80;95% CI,0.69 - 0.94;P = 0.0064),而对革兰阳性菌血流感染无影响(OR,1.06;95% CI,0.77 - 1.47)。亚组分析显示,使用肠外和肠内抗菌药物的SDD对总体血流感染、革兰阴性菌所致血流感染和总体死亡率的影响更大,OR分别为0.63(95% CI,0.46 - 0.87;P = 0.005)、0.30(95% CI,0.16 - 0.56;P < 0.001)和0.74(95% CI,0.61 - 0.91;P = 0.0034)。需要20例患者接受SDD治疗以预防一例革兰阴性菌血流感染,22例患者接受SDD治疗以预防一例死亡。