Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Genetics. 1978 Jun;89(2):315-40. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.2.315.
More than 700 EMS-treated second chromosomes marked with either cn (cinnabar) or bw (brown), and derived from long-inbred stocks, were measured for their heterozygous effects on viability in both isogenic (homozygous) and nonisogenic (heterozygous) backgrounds. Each test was replicated five times. When the background was homozygous, flies heterozygous for a treated chromosome were an average of 2.1% less viable, per 0.005 m EMS, than flies heterozygous for an untreated chromosome. Classified according to their homogous effect in an accompanying series of crosses, the lethal-bearing chromosomes (L), which carry genes of less drastic effects as well, reduced the viability of their heterozygous carriers by 3.3%, severe detrimentals (D(s)) by 2.2%, and mild detrimentals (D(m)) by 1.2% at this dose. In the heterozygous background, the mean heterozygous disadvantage for the entire group was 1%, or about half as large.--When computed separately for each count from a single mating, the heterozygous disadvantage was consistently greatest for the earliest counts (4.8%), next highest for the middle count (0.8%), and lowest in the latest count (0.5%), in the homozygous background, indicating that mutant heterozygotes were delayed in time of emergence. The figures in the heterozygous background were, again, reduced, but in the same direction.-The relative viability disadvantage of the cn marker was about 2(1/2) times greater in the homozygous than in the heterozygous background, further supporting the conclusion that the homozygous background can accentuate differences. The enhancement of treatment and marker effects could be a direct result of the level of background heterozygosity per se or attributable to the reduced vigor of the inbred strain.-Dominance, a measure of the heterozygous effect of a mutant relative to its homozygous effect, is greater for genes with small homozygous disadvantage than for more drastic genes. In the homozygous background the average dominance for lethals was 0.019 in contrast to 0.183 for mild detrimentals, supporting other published results suggesting that genes with milder effect, because they occur more frequently, have a greater impact on a population.-The homozygous D:L ratio of EMS mutations was 0.266 and the D(m): L ratio, 0.092, which are lower than comparable load ratios for spontaneous mutations, but greater than for X-ray induced mutations.
超过 700 个经 EMS 处理的第二染色体,用 cn(朱砂)或 bw(棕色)标记,并源自长期近交系,在同质(纯合)和非同质(杂合)背景下测量其对生存力的杂合效应。每次测试重复五次。当背景为纯合子时,携带处理染色体的杂合子比携带未处理染色体的杂合子平均低 2.1%,每 0.005 m EMS。根据它们在一系列伴随的交叉中的同源效应分类,携带致死基因的染色体(L),也携带效应较小的基因,使杂合携带者的存活率降低 3.3%,严重有害(D(s))降低 2.2%,轻度有害(D(m))降低 1.2%,剂量为 0.005 m EMS。在杂合背景下,整个群体的平均杂合劣势为 1%,约为一半。--当从单个交配中单独计算每个计数时,杂合劣势对于最早的计数(4.8%)最大,对于中间计数(0.8%)次之,对于最新计数(0.5%)最低,在纯合背景下,表明突变杂合子在出现时间上延迟。杂合背景下的数字再次减少,但方向相同。-在同质背景下,cn 标记的相对生存力劣势约为同质背景下的 2 倍,进一步支持同质背景可以强调差异的结论。处理和标记效应的增强可能是背景异质性水平本身的直接结果,或者归因于近交系活力的降低。-显性,衡量突变相对于纯合效应的杂合效应,对于具有较小纯合劣势的基因大于对于更剧烈的基因。在同质背景下,致死基因的平均显性为 0.019,而轻度有害基因的平均显性为 0.183,这支持了其他已发表的结果,表明具有较轻效应的基因,因为它们更频繁地发生,对种群的影响更大。-EMS 突变的同质 D:L 比值为 0.266,D(m):L 比值为 0.092,低于自发突变的可比负荷比,但高于 X 射线诱导突变的比值。