Goldberg Karen, Norman Ross, Hoch Jeffrey S, Schmitz Norbert, Windell Deborah, Brown Nicole, Malla Ashok
Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychoses-Montreal, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, Quebec.
Can J Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;51(14):895-903. doi: 10.1177/070674370605101405.
To evaluate the impact of a new early intervention service for first-episode psychosis on patient characteristics, service use, and hospital costs.
We examined clinical records of all first admissions to hospitals of patients diagnosed with first-episode psychoses (nonaffective) over a 3-year period before and after the introduction of an early intervention service, the Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP), in a defined catchment area. We examined demographic, clinical, and service use indices covering a 2-year period subsequent to the index admission for each patient.
Patients in the post-PEPP phase were significantly younger (P < 0.01), were more often male (P < 0.05), and were less likely to be admitted to hospital with an involuntary status (P < 0.05) or with injuries (P < 0.05) at the time of their first hospital admission. Over the 2 years following the initial admission, post-PEPP patients had significantly fewer admissions to a regular psychiatric service (P < 0.001) and made significantly fewer visits to the hospital emergency department (P < 0.01). There was a significant mean reduction in costs per case of regular hospital bed use ($1028.49, SD 528.02, compared with $792.28, SD 528.02; P < 0.01) and emergency visits ($519.18, SD 353.79, compared with $353.79, SD 345.0; P < 0.01). Time series analyses followed by Chow tests failed to confirm that these cost changes could be attributed specifically to the introduction of an early intervention service.
Introduction of a specialized early intervention program may be beneficial to patients and to the health care system. To evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of early intervention services, longer term and more detailed data may be required.
评估一项针对首发精神病的新型早期干预服务对患者特征、服务利用情况及医院成本的影响。
我们研究了在一个特定服务区域引入早期干预服务(精神病预防与早期干预项目,PEPP)之前及之后3年期间,所有首次因诊断为首发精神病(非情感性)入院患者的临床记录。我们检查了每位患者首次入院后2年期间的人口统计学、临床及服务利用指标。
PEPP阶段之后的患者首次入院时年龄显著更小(P < 0.01),男性比例更高(P < 0.05),非自愿入院(P < 0.05)或伴有损伤入院(P < 0.05)的可能性更低。在首次入院后的2年期间,PEPP阶段之后的患者入住常规精神科服务的次数显著更少(P < 0.001),前往医院急诊科就诊的次数也显著更少(P < 0.01)。常规医院病床使用的每例成本有显著的平均降低(分别为1028.49美元,标准差528.02,与792.28美元,标准差528.02相比;P < 0.01),急诊科就诊成本也有显著降低(分别为519.18美元,标准差353.79,与353.79美元,标准差345.0相比;P < 0.01)。时间序列分析随后进行的邹氏检验未能证实这些成本变化可具体归因于早期干预服务的引入。
引入专门的早期干预项目可能对患者及医疗保健系统有益。要评估早期干预服务的成本效益比,可能需要更长期和更详细的数据。