Thongboonkerd Visith, Semangoen Theptida, Chutipongtanate Somchai
Medical Molecular Biology Unit, Office for Research and Development, and Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
J Proteome Res. 2007 Mar;6(3):1209-14. doi: 10.1021/pr0605771. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
Anionic or acidic proteins are the main compositions of normal urinary proteome. Efforts to characterize human urinary proteome, thus, have focused mainly on the anionic compartment. The information of cationic or basic proteins present in the normal urine is virtually unknown. In the present study, we applied different methods to enrich cationic urinary proteome. Efficacies of these methods were compared using equal volume (1 L) of urine samples from the same pool obtained from 8 normal healthy individuals. Cation exchange chromatography using RESOURCE-S column provided the least amount of the recovered proteins, whereas batch adsorption using SP Sepharose 4 Fast Flow beads equilibrated with acetic acid (pH 4.8) provided the greatest yield of protein recovery. The recovered proteins were then resolved with 2-DE (pI 7-11) and identified by peptide mass fingerprinting using MALDI-TOF MS. There were several isoforms of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains enriched by these methods. In addition, three isoforms of interferon alpha-3 (IFNalpha3) and six isoforms of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), were also enriched. The enrichment of IFNalpha3 and EDN was particularly effective by batch adsorption using SP Sepharose 4 Fast Flow beads equilibrated with acetic acid (pH 6.0). Initial depletion of anionic components using DEAE batch adsorption reduced the recovery yield of these two proteins and did not improve recovery of any other cationic urinary proteins. We conclude that batch adsorption using SP Sepharose Fast Flow beads equilibrated with acetic acid (pH 6.0) is the method of choice to examine the basic/cationic urinary proteome, as this protocol provided the satisfactory yield of protein recovery and provided the greatest amount as well as maximal number of IFNalpha3 and EDN isoforms. Our data will be useful for further highly focused study targeting on cationic/basic urinary proteins. Moreover, the techniques described herein may be applicable for enrichment of cationic proteomes in other body fluids, cells, and tissues.
阴离子或酸性蛋白质是正常尿液蛋白质组的主要组成部分。因此,对人类尿液蛋白质组进行表征的工作主要集中在阴离子部分。正常尿液中存在的阳离子或碱性蛋白质的信息实际上是未知的。在本研究中,我们应用了不同的方法来富集阳离子尿液蛋白质组。使用来自8名正常健康个体的同一混合尿液样本等体积(1 L),比较了这些方法的效果。使用RESOURCE-S柱进行阳离子交换色谱法回收的蛋白质数量最少,而使用用乙酸(pH 4.8)平衡的SP Sepharose 4 Fast Flow磁珠进行批量吸附,蛋白质回收率最高。然后,将回收的蛋白质用二维电泳(pI 7 - 11)进行分离,并用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)通过肽质量指纹图谱进行鉴定。通过这些方法富集了免疫球蛋白重链和轻链的几种异构体。此外,还富集了三种干扰素α-3(IFNα3)异构体和六种嗜酸性粒细胞衍生神经毒素(EDN)异构体。使用用乙酸(pH 6.0)平衡的SP Sepharose 4 Fast Flow磁珠进行批量吸附对IFNα3和EDN的富集特别有效。使用DEAE批量吸附初步去除阴离子成分会降低这两种蛋白质的回收率,并且不会提高任何其他阳离子尿液蛋白质的回收率。我们得出结论,使用用乙酸(pH 6.0)平衡的SP Sepharose Fast Flow磁珠进行批量吸附是检测碱性/阳离子尿液蛋白质组的首选方法,因为该方案提供了令人满意的蛋白质回收率,并且提供了最多数量的IFNα3和EDN异构体。我们的数据将有助于进一步针对阳离子/碱性尿液蛋白质进行高度聚焦研究。此外,本文所述技术可能适用于富集其他体液、细胞和组织中的阳离子蛋白质组。