Suppr超能文献

回顾性病历审查结果,以确定接受高剂量调脂药物处方者治疗的患者在实现血脂目标方面的改善情况。

Results of retrospective chart review to determine improvement in lipid goal attainment in patients treated by high-volume prescribers of lipid-modifying drugs.

作者信息

Stacy Thomas A, Egger Allison

机构信息

Total Therapeutic Management, Inc., 95 Chastain Rd., Suite 302, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(9):745-51. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.9.745.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a primary focus in cholesterol management on the elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) component of dyslipidemia and a secondary focus on the other components of dyslipidemia, such as low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), high triglycerides (TGs), and high non-HDL-C.

OBJECTIVE

This was a physician practice analysis to examine the real-world therapeutic management of patients diagnosed with hyperlipidemia and/or hypercholesterolemia according to the guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel Third Report (ATP III) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Additionally, the number of patients who should be diagnosed with mixed hyperlipidemia instead of hyperlipidemia or hypercholesterolemia was estimated.

METHODS

A total of 600 high-volume prescribers of lipid-modifying drugs were identified in 6 metropolitan areas using the IMS Health prescription database. A total of 101 physician prescribers (about 17%) agreed to participate in the study and had the necessary medical records available. The participating prescribers were asked to identify all patients aged between 18 and 79 years who were seen in their practice in the last 2 years having a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 272.4) and/or hypercholesterolemia (ICD-9-CM code 272.0). ICD-9-CM code 272.2 (mixed hyperlipidemia) was purposely excluded from the criteria for patient chart selection in order to estimate the prevalence of mixed hyperlipidemia in patients previously diagnosed with hyperlipidemia and/or hypercholesterolemia. A random number generator was used to select 25 patient medical records from each office. A common instrument was used to collect data on patient demographics; clinical history; comorbid disease states; laboratory test results, including liver function; and 4 values for serum cholesterol (total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG). Total cholesterol was recorded to permit calculation of non-HDL-C. Data collection via patient chart abstraction occurred from March 2004 through August 2004, performed by a staff member in each physician practice who had been trained for this purpose. Drug prescribing was identified from the patient chart.

RESULTS

For the physician practice assessment portion of the project, we used patient charts if there was a complete (total cholesterol, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C) lipid profile for baseline and follow-up, and a minimum of 6 weeks between baseline and follow-up values. At follow-up, the proportion of patients meeting goal lipid values according to the guidelines for LDL-C was 68%, 63% for HDL-C, 59% for TG, and 68% for non-HDL-C. Only 32% of patients met all 3 goals (LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG). The average time between the baseline and follow-up lipid profile was 3.7 years, with a median of 2.9 years, and a minimum of 6 weeks and a maximum of 42 years. Compared with baseline, the most recent follow-up lipid assessment for HDL-C goal attainment showed improvement by an absolute 6%, from 57% to 63% of patients. TG goal attainment improved an absolute 18% (from 41% to 59%), LDL-C goal attainment improved an absolute 45% (from 23% to 68%), non-HDL-C goal attainment improved an absolute 46% (from 22% to 68%), and the combined goals of LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG improved from 8% of patients at baseline to 32% at follow-up. Of the 2,119 patients in the study population, 1,784 (84%) at the time of chart review had been prescribed at least 1 lipid-modifying medication: 1,552 (87%) a single lipid-modifying medication and 232 (13%) combination therapy. The hydroxymethylglutaryl (HMG) coenzyme-A reductase class (statins) accounted for 89% of the monotherapy regimens. Of the patients with baseline LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG readings, 40% could have been diagnosed as having mixed hyperlipidemia, defined as having (a) baseline LDL-C greater than their NCEP ATP III goal and (b) either baseline TG of >150 mg/dL or a baseline HDL-C of <40 mg/dL for males or <50 mg/dL for females. Of the 40% of patients estimated to have mixed hyperlipidemia, 69% were prescribed lipid-modifying monotherapy, 18% were prescribed combination drug therapy, and 14% were not prescribed drug therapy.

CONCLUSION

Attainment of therapeutic goals for serum lipids improved from baseline to follow-up, but approximately one third of patients did not achieve individual lipid goals and two thirds of patients did not attain goal for all 3 targets (LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG).

摘要

背景

在胆固醇管理中,主要关注血脂异常中升高的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)成分,其次关注血脂异常的其他成分,如低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、高甘油三酯(TGs)和高非HDL-C。

目的

这是一项医师实践分析,旨在根据美国国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)成人治疗小组第三次报告(ATP III)和美国心脏协会(AHA)的指南,研究诊断为高脂血症和/或高胆固醇血症患者的实际治疗管理情况。此外,还估计了应被诊断为混合性高脂血症而非高脂血症或高胆固醇血症的患者数量。

方法

利用艾美仕市场研究公司(IMS Health)的处方数据库,在6个大都市地区确定了600名大量开具调脂药物的医生。共有101名医生处方者(约17%)同意参与研究,并提供了必要的病历。要求参与的处方者识别出过去2年内在其诊所就诊的所有年龄在18至79岁之间、诊断为高脂血症(国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本[ICD-9-CM]编码272.4)和/或高胆固醇血症(ICD-9-CM编码272.0)的患者。为了估计先前诊断为高脂血症和/或高胆固醇血症患者中混合性高脂血症的患病率,故意将ICD-9-CM编码272.2(混合性高脂血症)排除在患者病历选择标准之外。使用随机数生成器从每个诊所选择25份患者病历。使用通用工具收集患者人口统计学、临床病史、合并疾病状态、实验室检查结果(包括肝功能)以及血清胆固醇的4个值(总胆固醇、LDL-C、HDL-C、TG)的数据。记录总胆固醇以计算非HDL-C。通过患者病历摘要进行数据收集的时间为2004年3月至2004年8月,由每个医生诊所中为此目的接受过培训的工作人员进行。从患者病历中识别药物处方情况。

结果

对于该项目的医师实践评估部分,如果有完整的(总胆固醇、TG、HDL-C和LDL-C)血脂谱用于基线和随访,且基线和随访值之间至少间隔6周,我们就使用患者病历。在随访时,根据LDL-C指南达到目标血脂值的患者比例为68%,HDL-C为63%,TG为59%,非HDL-C为68%。只有32%的患者达到了所有3个目标(LDL-C、HDL-C和TG)。基线和随访血脂谱之间的平均时间为3.7年,中位数为2.9年,最短为六周,最长为42年。与基线相比,最近一次随访中HDL-C目标达成情况的血脂评估显示,达到目标的患者绝对改善了6%,从57%升至63%。TG目标达成率绝对提高了18%(从41%升至59%),LDL-C目标达成率绝对提高了45%(从23%升至68%),非HDL-C目标达成率绝对提高了百分之四十六(从22%升至68%),LDL-C、HDL-C和TG的综合目标从基线时8%的患者提高到随访时的32%。在研究人群的2119名患者中,在病历审查时,1784名(84%)患者至少开具了1种调脂药物处方:1552名(87%)患者开具了单一调脂药物,232名(13%)患者接受了联合治疗。羟甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶类(他汀类)占单一疗法方案的89%。在有基线LDL-C、HDL-C和TG读数的患者中,40%可能被诊断为患有混合性高脂血症,定义为(a)基线LDL-C高于其NCEP ATP III目标,以及(b)男性基线TG>150mg/dL或女性基线HDL-C<40mg/dL或<50mg/dL。在估计患有混合性高脂血症的40%患者中,69%的患者接受了调脂单一疗法,18%的患者接受了联合药物治疗,14%的患者未接受药物治疗。

结论

从基线到随访,血清脂质治疗目标的达成情况有所改善,但约三分之一的患者未实现个体脂质目标,三分之二的患者未实现所有3个目标(LDL-C、HDL-C和TG)。

相似文献

2
LDL-C goal attainment among patients newly diagnosed with coronary heart disease or diabetes in a commercial HMO.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Oct;13(8):652-63. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.8.652.
4
Current lipid management and low cholesterol goal attainment in common daily practice in Spain. The REALITY Study.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22 Suppl 3:1-12. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422003-00002.
5
Effectiveness of a pharmacy care management program for veterans with dyslipidemia.
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jul;33(7):736-43. doi: 10.1002/phar.1273. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
7
Prevalence of dyslipidemia and lipid goal attainment in statin-treated subjects from 3 data sources: a retrospective analysis.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Dec;1(6):e001800. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.001800. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
9
Pitavastatin: novel effects on lipid parameters.
Atheroscler Suppl. 2011 Nov;12(3):277-84. doi: 10.1016/S1567-5688(11)70887-X.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of LDL goal achievement in statin consumption, south east of Iran.
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10786. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90228-0.
4
Clinical lipid control success rate before and after percutaneous coronary intervention in iran; a single center study.
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Jun;15(6):467-72. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.3370. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
5
Prevalence and types of persistent dyslipidemia in patients treated with statins.
Croat Med J. 2013 Aug;54(4):339-45. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.339.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验