Suppr超能文献

二维时间飞跃法与三维椭圆中心对比增强磁共振静脉血管造影术在疑似脑静脉和静脉窦血栓形成患者中的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of 2D time-of-flight and 3D elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR venography in patients with presumptive cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis.

作者信息

Klingebiel R, Bauknecht H C, Bohner G, Kirsch R, Berger J, Masuhr F

机构信息

Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2007 Feb;14(2):139-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01574.x.

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated an elliptic centric ordered 3D (ec 3D) magnetic resonance venography (MRV) technique in comparison to 2D time-of-flight (2D TOF) MRV in patients with presumptive cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). Twenty-five patients (mean age 40.6 +/- 16.5 years) with presumptive CVST underwent cerebral MRI including 2D TOF and ec 3D MRV. Radiologic findings and clinical outcome were correlated. MRV studies were evaluated by two neuroradiologists in a blinded manner for image quality, assessment of various sinus, internal cerebral veins (ICV), vein of Labbé and Galen (VL/VG) as well as for additional imaging procedures required. Sensitivity/specificity of ec 3D MRV amounted to 85.7%/97.2% as compared with 2D TOF 71.4%/55.6 %. Ec 3D MRV performed superior in terms of image quality as well as assessment of all sinus and veins except for the straight sinus. Additional imaging procedures were less often required in ec 3D MRV studies (28% vs. 66% for 2D TOF MRV; P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was significantly increased by using ec 3D MRV (93.1% vs. 70.9% of readings). The results of our study provide additional evidence for the superiority of ec 3D compared with 2D TOF MR venography for the diagnosis or exclusion of acute CVST in daily clinical practice.

摘要

我们对一种椭圆中心有序三维(ec 3D)磁共振静脉血管造影(MRV)技术进行了回顾性评估,并与二维时间飞跃(2D TOF)MRV在疑似脑静脉窦血栓形成(CVST)患者中的应用进行比较。25例(平均年龄40.6±16.5岁)疑似CVST患者接受了包括2D TOF和ec 3D MRV的脑部MRI检查。将影像学检查结果与临床结果进行关联分析。两名神经放射科医生以盲法对MRV研究进行评估,评估内容包括图像质量、各种静脉窦、大脑内静脉(ICV)、Labbe静脉和Galen静脉(VL/VG)的评估以及所需的额外影像学检查。与2D TOF的71.4%/55.6%相比,ec 3D MRV的敏感性/特异性分别为85.7%/97.2%。除直窦外,ec 3D MRV在图像质量以及所有静脉窦和静脉的评估方面表现更优。ec 3D MRV研究中所需的额外影像学检查较少(2D TOF MRV为66%,ec 3D MRV为28%;P<0.001)。使用ec 3D MRV时,观察者间的一致性显著提高(93.1%对70.9%的读数)。我们研究结果为ec 3D在日常临床实践中诊断或排除急性CVST方面优于2D TOF MR静脉血管造影提供了更多证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验