Suppr超能文献

在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中,血清淀粉样蛋白A比C反应蛋白更能预测临床结局。

Serum amyloid A is a better predictor of clinical outcomes than C-reactive protein in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Kosuge Masami, Ebina Toshiaki, Ishikawa Toshiyuki, Hibi Kiyoshi, Tsukahara Kengo, Okuda Jyun, Iwahashi Noriaki, Ozaki Hiroyuki, Yano Hideto, Kusama Ikuyoshi, Nakati Tastuya, Umemura Satoshi, Kimura Kazuo

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Circ J. 2007 Feb;71(2):186-90. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.186.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with adverse outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS); however, the prognostic significance of serum amyloid A (SAA), also an important inflammatory marker, remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ability of SAA, in combination with CRP, to predict clinical outcomes was evaluated in 277 patients with NSTE-ACS. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of elevated SAA (>0.8 mg/dl) and elevated high-sensitivity CRP (>0.200 mg/dl) on admission: group 1, both SAA and CRP normal (n=133); group 2, SAA normal, but CRP elevated (n=30); group 3, SAA elevated, but CRP normal (n=28); and group 4, both SAA and CRP elevated (n=86). In groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, the rates of combined endpoints including death, (re)infarction, or urgent target-vessel revascularization at 30 days were 8%, 3%, 25%, and 23%, respectively (p=0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that as compared with group 1, the odds ratios for combined endpoints in groups 2, 3, and 4 were 0.50 (p=0.30), 1.95 (p=0.038), and 1.86 (p=0.044), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the level of CRP, elevated SAA is associated with adverse 30-day outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS, so SAA is a better predictor of clinical outcome than CRP in these patients.

摘要

背景

C反应蛋白(CRP)升高与非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)的不良预后相关;然而,血清淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)作为一种重要的炎症标志物,其预后意义仍不明确。

方法与结果

在277例NSTE-ACS患者中评估了SAA联合CRP预测临床结局的能力。根据入院时SAA升高(>0.8mg/dl)和高敏CRP升高(>0.200mg/dl)的情况对患者进行分类:第1组,SAA和CRP均正常(n=133);第2组,SAA正常但CRP升高(n=30);第3组,SAA升高但CRP正常(n=28);第4组,SAA和CRP均升高(n=86)。在第1、2、3和4组中,30天时包括死亡、(再)梗死或紧急靶血管血运重建在内的联合终点发生率分别为8%、3%、25%和23%(p=0.002)。多因素分析显示,与第1组相比,第2、3和4组联合终点的比值比分别为0.50(p=0.30)、1.95(p=0.038)和1.86(p=0.044)。

结论

无论CRP水平如何,SAA升高均与NSTE-ACS患者30天不良结局相关,因此在这些患者中,SAA比CRP是更好的临床结局预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验