Miyasaka L S, Atallah A N, Soares B G O
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazilian Cochrane Centre, Rua de Pedro Toledo 598, Vila Clementino, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04039-001.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD004518. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004518.pub2.
Anxiety is a very common mental health problem in the general population and in the primary care setting. Herbal medicines are popularly used worldwide and could be an option for treating anxiety if shown to be effective and safe. Passiflora (passionflower extract) is one of these compounds.
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of passiflora for treating any anxiety disorder.
The following sources were used: electronic databases: Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCDANCTR-Studies), Medline and Lilacs; Cross-checking references; contact with authors of included studies and manufacturers of passiflora.
Relevant randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of passiflora using any dose, regime, or method of administration for people with any primary diagnosis of general anxiety disorder, anxiety neurosis, chronic anxiety status or any other mental health disorder in which anxiety is a core symptom (panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, social phobia, agoraphobia, other types of phobia, postraumatic stress disorder). Effectiveness was measured using clinical outcome measures such as Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) and other scales for anxiety symptoms.
Two reviewers independently selected the trials found through the search strategy, extracted data, performed the trial quality analyses and entered data. Where any disagreements occured, the third reviewer was consulted. Methodological quality of the trials included in this review was assessed using the criteria described in the Cochrane Handbook. For dichotomous outcomes, relative risk with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and for continuous outcomes, weighted mean difference with 95%CI was used.
Two studies, with a total of 198 participants, were eligible for inclusion in this review. Based on one study, a lack of difference in the efficacy of benzodiazepines and passiflora was indicated. Dropout rates were similar between the two interventions. Although the findings from one study suggested an improvement in job performance in favour of passiflora (post-hoc outcome) and one study showed a lower rate of drowsiness as a side effect with passiflora as compared with mexazolam, neither of these findings reached statistical significance.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: RCTs examining the effectiveness of passiflora for anxiety are too few in number to permit any conclusions to be drawn. RCTs with larger samples that compare the effectiveness of passiflora with placebo and other types of medication, including antidepressants, are needed.
焦虑是普通人群和初级保健机构中非常常见的心理健康问题。草药在全球广泛使用,如果证明有效且安全,可能是治疗焦虑的一种选择。西番莲(西番莲提取物)就是其中一种化合物。
研究西番莲治疗任何焦虑症的有效性和安全性。
使用了以下来源:电子数据库:Cochrane协作抑郁、焦虑和神经症Cochrane对照试验注册库(CCDANCTR-Studies)、Medline和Lilacs;交叉核对参考文献;与纳入研究的作者和西番莲制造商联系。
针对任何初步诊断为广泛性焦虑症、焦虑神经症、慢性焦虑状态或任何其他以焦虑为核心症状的心理健康障碍(惊恐障碍、强迫症、社交恐惧症、广场恐惧症、其他类型的恐惧症、创伤后应激障碍)患者,使用任何剂量、方案或给药方法的西番莲相关随机和半随机对照试验。使用临床结局指标如汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)和其他焦虑症状量表来衡量有效性。
两名评审员独立选择通过检索策略找到的试验,提取数据,进行试验质量分析并录入数据。出现任何分歧时,会咨询第三位评审员。本综述纳入试验的方法学质量使用Cochrane手册中描述的标准进行评估。对于二分法结局,计算95%置信区间(CI)的相对风险,对于连续结局,使用95%CI的加权平均差。
两项研究,共198名参与者,符合纳入本综述的条件。基于一项研究,表明苯二氮䓬类药物和西番莲的疗效无差异。两种干预措施的脱落率相似。尽管一项研究的结果表明西番莲有利于工作表现的改善(事后结局),且一项研究表明与美沙唑仑相比,西番莲作为副作用的嗜睡率较低,但这些结果均未达到统计学意义。
检验西番莲治疗焦虑有效性的随机对照试验数量太少,无法得出任何结论。需要进行更大样本量的随机对照试验,将西番莲的有效性与安慰剂及其他类型药物(包括抗抑郁药)进行比较。