Su Chinyu, Lewis James D, Goldberg Brittany, Brensinger Colleen, Lichtenstein Gary R
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and University of Pennsylvania Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
Gastroenterology. 2007 Feb;132(2):516-26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.037. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Knowledge of the placebo outcomes and understanding specific study features that influence these outcomes is important for designing future clinical trials evaluating therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC). The aims of this study were to estimate the placebo rates of remission and response in placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials for active UC and to identify factors influencing these rates.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials evaluating therapies for active UC identified from MEDLINE from 1966 through 2005.
Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of the placebo rates of remission and response were 13% (95% confidence interval, 9%-18%; range, 0%-40%; median, 12%) and 28% (95% confidence interval, 23%-33%; range, 0%-67%; median, 30%), respectively, both with significant heterogeneity. Studies that used more stringent definitions of outcomes had lower placebo rates of remission and response. Study duration, number of study visits, disease duration, baseline composite and rectal bleeding scores of the disease activity index, and inclusion of endoscopic mucosal healing as the remission definition all were associated with the placebo remission rate.
Rates of remission in the placebo arm of UC clinical trials ranges from 0% to 40%. The placebo remission rates are influenced by the trial length, number of study visits, use of stricter remission definitions, and design features that enroll patients with more active disease. These factors should be considered when designing future placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with active UC.
了解安慰剂效应以及认识影响这些效应的特定研究特征,对于设计未来评估溃疡性结肠炎(UC)治疗方法的临床试验非常重要。本研究的目的是估计活动性UC安慰剂对照随机临床试验中的安慰剂缓解率和反应率,并确定影响这些率的因素。
我们对1966年至2005年从MEDLINE中检索到的评估活动性UC治疗方法的安慰剂对照随机临床试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
40项研究符合纳入标准。安慰剂缓解率和反应率的合并估计值分别为13%(95%置信区间,9%-18%;范围,0%-40%;中位数,12%)和28%(95%置信区间,23%-33%;范围,0%-67%;中位数,30%),两者均存在显著异质性。使用更严格结局定义的研究,其安慰剂缓解率和反应率较低。研究持续时间、研究访视次数、疾病持续时间、疾病活动指数的基线综合评分和直肠出血评分,以及将内镜黏膜愈合纳入缓解定义,均与安慰剂缓解率相关。
UC临床试验安慰剂组的缓解率范围为0%至40%。安慰剂缓解率受试验时长、研究访视次数、更严格缓解定义的使用以及纳入疾病更活跃患者的设计特征影响。在设计未来活动性UC患者的安慰剂对照临床试验时,应考虑这些因素。