Suppr超能文献

影响类风湿关节炎临床试验中安慰剂反应的因素:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的荟萃分析。

Factors Influencing Placebo Responses in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.

Eisai Co., Ltd., 4-6-10 Koishikawa, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 112-8088, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Mar;40(3):197-209. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00887-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A better understanding of placebo responses and the specific factors influencing these outcomes is important for clinical trial design. We investigated the magnitude of placebo responses at 3 months and the potential factors influencing these outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials of pharmacological agents for RA identified from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The primary placebo outcome was American College of Rheumatology 20% response rate (ACR20). Data were pooled with a random-effects model. Factors influencing placebo response were assessed by meta-regression analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies conducted in non-Western countries only versus in Western countries (North America and/or Europe) only or both.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 88 studies comprising 8406 patients receiving a placebo. The pooled estimate of placebo ACR20 was 29.0% (range 10.0-46.2; 95% confidence interval 27.2-30.9). Placebo ACR20 was negatively associated with trials in non-Western (Asian) countries and patient populations showing an inadequate response to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the multivariable analysis, whereas it was positively associated with the year of publication. No background DMARD treatment was also a negative predictor (albeit statistically non-significant). In subgroup analyses of Western and multiregional studies, study population and publication year were significant factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that study location, patient population, and a background DMARD treatment influence placebo ACR20. These along with placebo response temporal profiles have important implications for designing and interpreting RA clinical trials.

摘要

背景与目的

更好地了解安慰剂反应及其影响这些结果的具体因素,对于临床试验设计非常重要。我们调查了类风湿关节炎(RA)临床试验中 3 个月时安慰剂反应的幅度以及可能影响这些结果的因素。

方法

我们从 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库中系统地检索了针对 RA 的药理学药物的随机安慰剂对照试验。主要的安慰剂结果是美国风湿病学会 20%反应率(ACR20)。采用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总。采用荟萃回归分析评估影响安慰剂反应的因素。进行了仅在非西方国家(亚洲)进行的研究与仅在西方国家(北美和/或欧洲)进行的研究或两者都进行的亚组分析。

结果

荟萃分析包括 88 项研究,共纳入 8406 名接受安慰剂治疗的患者。安慰剂 ACR20 的汇总估计值为 29.0%(范围 10.0-46.2;95%置信区间 27.2-30.9)。在多变量分析中,安慰剂 ACR20 与非西方国家(亚洲)的试验以及对生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)反应不足的患者人群呈负相关,而与发表年份呈正相关。多变量分析中,无背景 DMARD 治疗也是一个负预测因素(尽管统计学上无显著性)。在西方国家和多区域研究的亚组分析中,研究人群和发表年份是重要的因素。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,研究地点、患者人群和背景 DMARD 治疗会影响安慰剂 ACR20。这些因素以及安慰剂反应的时间曲线对设计和解释 RA 临床试验具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验