Dreier Jens P, Kleeberg Jörg, Alam Mesbah, Major Sebastian, Kohl-Bareis Matthias, Petzold Gabor C, Victorov Ilya, Dirnagl Ulrich, Obrenovitch Tiho P, Priller Josef
Department of Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2007 Feb;232(2):204-13.
Two different theories of migraine aura exist: In the vascular theory of Wolff, intracerebral vasoconstriction causes migraine aura via energy deficiency, whereas in the neuronal theory of Leão and Morison, spreading depression (SD) initiates the aura. Recently, it has been shown that the cerebrovascular constrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1) elicits SD when applied to the cortical surface, a finding that could provide a bridge between the vascular and the neuronal theories of migraine aura. Several arguments support the notion that ET-1-induced SD results from local vasoconstriction, but definite proof is missing. If ET-1 induces SD via vasoconstriction/ischemia, then neuronal damage is likely to occur, contrasting with the fact that SD in the otherwise normal cortex is not associated with any lesion. To test this hypothesis, we have performed a comprehensive histologic study of the effects of ET-1 when applied topically to the cerebral cortex of halothane-anesthetized rats. Our assessment included histologic stainings and immunohistochemistry for glial fibrillary acidic protein, heat shock protein 70, and transferase dUTP nick-end labeling assay. During ET-1 application, we recorded (i) subarachnoid direct current (DC) electroencephalogram, (ii) local cerebral blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry, and (iii) changes of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin by spectroscopy. At an ET-1 concentration of 1 muM, at which only 6 of 12 animals generated SD, a microarea with selective neuronal death was found only in those animals demonstrating SD. In another five selected animals, which had not shown SD in response to ET-1, SD was triggered at a second cranial window by KCl and propagated from there to the window exposed to ET-1. This treatment also resulted in a microarea of neuronal damage. In contrast, SD invading from outside did not induce neuronal damage in the absence of ET-1 (n = 4) or in the presence of ET-1 if ET-1 was coapplied with BQ-123, an ET(A) receptor antagonist (n = 4). In conclusion, SD in presence of ET-1 induced a microarea of selective neuronal necrosis no matter where the SD originated. This effect of ET-1 appears to be mediated by the ET(A) receptor.
在沃尔夫的血管学说中,脑内血管收缩通过能量缺乏导致偏头痛先兆,而在莱昂和莫里森的神经元学说中,扩散性抑制(SD)引发先兆。最近的研究表明,脑血管收缩剂内皮素 -1(ET -1)应用于皮质表面时可引发SD,这一发现可能在偏头痛先兆的血管学说和神经元学说之间架起一座桥梁。有几个论据支持ET -1诱导的SD是由局部血管收缩引起的这一观点,但确凿的证据尚缺。如果ET -1通过血管收缩/缺血诱导SD,那么很可能会发生神经元损伤,这与在其他方面正常的皮质中SD与任何病变无关这一事实相矛盾。为了验证这一假设,我们对将ET -1局部应用于氟烷麻醉大鼠大脑皮质的效果进行了全面的组织学研究。我们的评估包括胶质纤维酸性蛋白、热休克蛋白70的组织学染色和免疫组化,以及脱氧核糖核苷酸末端转移酶介导的缺口末端标记检测。在应用ET -1期间,我们记录了(i)蛛网膜下腔直流电(DC)脑电图,(ii)通过激光多普勒血流仪测量局部脑血流量,以及(iii)通过光谱法测量氧合血红蛋白和脱氧血红蛋白的变化。在ET -1浓度为1μM时,12只动物中只有6只产生了SD,仅在那些出现SD的动物中发现了一个有选择性神经元死亡的微区。在另外5只对ET -1未出现SD反应的选定动物中,通过氯化钾在第二个颅窗触发了SD,并从那里传播到暴露于ET -1的窗口。这种处理也导致了一个神经元损伤的微区。相比之下,在没有ET -1的情况下(n = 4)或在ET -1与ET(A)受体拮抗剂BQ -123共同应用时(n = 4),从外部侵入的SD不会诱导神经元损伤。总之,无论SD起源何处,在ET -1存在的情况下,SD都会诱导一个选择性神经元坏死的微区。ET -1的这种作用似乎是由ET(A)受体介导的。