Lesko L J
Food and Drug Administration, Office of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics, Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb;81(2):170-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100045.
It has been almost 3 years since the launch of the FDA critical path initiative following the publication of the paper "Innovation or Stagnation: Challenges and Opportunities on the Critical Path of New Medical Product Development." The initiative was intended to create an urgency with the drug development enterprise to address the so-called "productivity problem" in modern drug development. Clinical pharmacologists are strategically aligned with solutions designed to reduce late phase clinical trial failures to show adequate efficacy and/or safety. This article reviews some of the ways that clinical pharmacologists can lead and implement change in the drug development process. It includes a discussion of model-based, semi-mechanistic drug development, drug/disease models that facilitate informed clinical trial designs and optimal dosing, the qualification process and criteria for new biomarkers and surrogate endpoints, approaches to streamlining clinical trials and new types of interaction between industry and FDA such as the end-of-phase 2A and voluntary genomic data submission meetings respectively.
自发表《创新还是停滞:新医疗产品开发关键路径上的挑战与机遇》一文后,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关键路径计划启动已近3年。该计划旨在促使药品开发企业产生紧迫感,以解决现代药物开发中所谓的“生产力问题”。临床药理学家在战略上与旨在减少后期临床试验失败(以证明有足够疗效和/或安全性)的解决方案保持一致。本文回顾了临床药理学家在药物开发过程中引领和实施变革的一些方式。其中包括基于模型的半机制药物开发、有助于开展明智临床试验设计和优化给药的药物/疾病模型、新生物标志物和替代终点的鉴定过程及标准、简化临床试验的方法以及行业与FDA之间新型互动方式,如分别举行的2A期结束会议和自愿基因组数据提交会议。