Basu Sanjay, Smith-Rohrberg Duncan, Hanck Sarah, Altice Frederick L
AIDS Program, Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, in New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
AIDS Public Policy J. 2005 Spring-Summer;20(1-2):3-24.
Before introducing an HIV testing protocol into correctional facilities, the unique nature of these environments must be taken into account. We analyze three testing strategies that have been used in correctional settings--mandatory, voluntary, and routine "opt out" testing--and conclude that routine testing is most likely beneficial to inmates, the correctional system, and the outside community. The ethics of pre-release testing, and the issues surrounding segregation, confidentiality, and linking prisoners with community-based care, also play a role in determining how best to establish HIV testing strategies in correctional facilities. Testing must be performed in a manner that is not simply beneficial to public health, but also enhances the safety and health status of individual inmates. Longer-stay prison settings provide ample opportunities not just for testing but also for in-depth counseling, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and antiretroviral therapy. Jails present added complexities because of their shorter stay with respect to prisons, and testing, treatment, and counseling policies must be adapted to these settings.
在将艾滋病毒检测方案引入惩教机构之前,必须考虑这些环境的独特性质。我们分析了在惩教环境中使用的三种检测策略——强制检测、自愿检测和常规“选择退出”检测——并得出结论,常规检测最有可能使囚犯、惩教系统和外部社区受益。释放前检测的伦理问题,以及围绕隔离、保密以及将囚犯与社区护理联系起来的问题,在确定如何在惩教机构中建立最佳艾滋病毒检测策略方面也发挥着作用。检测必须以不仅有利于公共卫生,而且能提高个别囚犯的安全和健康状况的方式进行。长期关押的监狱环境不仅提供了充足的检测机会,还提供了深入咨询、心理健康和药物滥用治疗以及抗逆转录病毒治疗的机会。由于监狱的关押时间比监狱短,监狱带来了更多的复杂性,检测、治疗和咨询政策必须适应这些环境。