Cox C E, Graveline J F, Luongo J M
University of Tennessee, Memphis.
Drugs. 1991;42 Suppl 3:41-50. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199100423-00009.
Two controlled United States trials compared the safety and efficacy of cefpodoxime proxetil (100mg twice daily) with either cefaclor (250mg 3 times daily) or amoxicillin (250mg 3 times daily) in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Treatment duration was 7 days. 307 of 762 patients treated with cefpodoxime proxetil, 99 of 190 treated with cefaclor, and 57 of 185 treated with amoxicillin were evaluable for efficacy. 311, 99 and 59 pathogens were isolated from cefpodoxime proxetil, cefaclor and amoxicillin patients, respectively, the most common pathogens being Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Bacteriological cure rates were 80% (247/307), 82% (81/99) and 70% (40/57) for cefpodoxime proxetil, cefaclor and amoxicillin, respectively. Respective clinical cure rates were 79% (242/307), 79% (78/99) and 72% (41/57). Cefpodoxime proxetil was well tolerated, and there was no significant difference between the groups in the overall incidence of adverse experiences. Thus, cefpodoxime proxetil is efficacious and safe in the treatment of patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections and compares favourably with cefaclor and amoxicillin.
两项美国对照试验比较了头孢泊肟酯(每日两次,每次100mg)与头孢克洛(每日三次,每次250mg)或阿莫西林(每日三次,每次250mg)在单纯性尿路感染患者中的安全性和疗效。治疗疗程为7天。接受头孢泊肟酯治疗的762例患者中有307例、接受头孢克洛治疗的190例患者中有99例、接受阿莫西林治疗的185例患者中有57例可评估疗效。分别从接受头孢泊肟酯、头孢克洛和阿莫西林治疗的患者中分离出311、99和59种病原体,最常见的病原体为大肠埃希菌、克雷伯菌属、奇异变形杆菌和腐生葡萄球菌。头孢泊肟酯、头孢克洛和阿莫西林的细菌学治愈率分别为80%(247/307)、82%(81/99)和70%(40/57)。各自的临床治愈率分别为79%(242/307)、79%(78/99)和72%(41/57)。头孢泊肟酯耐受性良好,各组不良事件总发生率无显著差异。因此,头孢泊肟酯治疗单纯性尿路感染患者有效且安全,与头孢克洛和阿莫西林相比具有优势。