Lily O, McFadden E, Hensor E, Johnson M, Ford H
Neurosciences Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.
Mult Scler. 2006 Dec;12(6):808-13. doi: 10.1177/1352458506070946.
Disease specific quality of life was measured in the Leeds Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Treatment Programme (n = 210) using the self-report Leeds MS Quality of Life (LMSQoL) scale. The results showed a significant and sustained increase in quality of life associated with 'disease modifying' treatment. This contrasts with the Expanded Disability Status Scores (EDSS), which showed no measurable improvement. An increase in the LMSQoL score did not correlate with baseline age, disease duration, disability or number of prior relapses. There was no significant difference in treatment effect between relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive MS patients, or between patients receiving different products. However, patients with a poor quality of life at baseline showed the most benefit from treatment. Those who had their treatment stopped due to progression, side-effects or lack of effect had significantly lower LMSQoL scores on treatment. In this study, the LMSQoL scale was responsive to change and was easy to administer in a clinical setting.
在利兹多发性硬化症(MS)治疗项目(n = 210)中,使用自填式利兹MS生活质量(LMSQoL)量表对特定疾病的生活质量进行了测量。结果显示,与“疾病修正”治疗相关的生活质量有显著且持续的提高。这与扩展残疾状态评分(EDSS)形成对比,后者未显示出可测量的改善。LMSQoL评分的增加与基线年龄、疾病持续时间、残疾程度或既往复发次数无关。复发缓解型和继发进展型MS患者之间,或接受不同产品治疗的患者之间,治疗效果没有显著差异。然而,基线生活质量较差的患者从治疗中获益最大。那些因病情进展、副作用或治疗无效而停止治疗的患者,治疗期间的LMSQoL评分显著较低。在本研究中,LMSQoL量表对变化有反应,且易于在临床环境中实施。