Arnell Karen M, Howe Ashley E, Joanisse Marc F, Klein Raymond M
Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3AI Canada.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Oct;34(7):1472-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03195912.
When two masked, to-be-attended targets are presented within approximately half a second of each other, performance on the second target (T2) suffers, relative to when the targets are presented further apart in time or when the first target (T1) can be ignored. This pattern of results is known as the attentional blink (AB). Typically, participants differ with respect to the magnitude of their AB and their overall target accuracy. Despite investigations as to what participant characteristics may influence AB performance (e.g., age, brain damage, or mood state), there has been no focused examination of whether individual differences in cognitive performance measures predict the magnitude of the AB or overall rapid serial visual presentation(RSVP) target accuracy. Our university studentparticipants performed single-target and dual-target RSVP tasks, as well as a selection of cognitive tasks that did not use RSVP presentations, with color, letter, digit, and object stimuli. Overall performance on each of the RSVP targets (T1, T2, and single target) was predicted by speeded manual and vocal identification times to isolated stimuli and by performance with other RSVP targets. However, the magnitude of the AB was predicted only by T1 accuracy, not by any other performance measures. The results suggest that individual differences in AB magnitude do not result from differences in effective RSVP target encoding and are not well explained by varied information-processing abilities.
当两个被遮蔽的、需要被关注的目标在彼此大约半秒的时间内呈现时,相对于目标在时间上间隔更远呈现的情况,或者相对于可以忽略第一个目标(T1)的情况,第二个目标(T2)的表现会变差。这种结果模式被称为注意瞬脱(AB)。通常,参与者在其注意瞬脱的程度和他们整体的目标准确性方面存在差异。尽管已经对哪些参与者特征可能影响注意瞬脱表现(例如年龄、脑损伤或情绪状态)进行了研究,但尚未对认知表现测量中的个体差异是否能预测注意瞬脱的程度或整体快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)目标准确性进行针对性的考察。我们的大学生参与者完成了单目标和双目标RSVP任务,以及一系列不使用RSVP呈现方式的认知任务,使用了颜色、字母、数字和物体刺激。每个RSVP目标(T1、T2和单目标)的整体表现是由对孤立刺激的快速手动和语音识别时间以及其他RSVP目标的表现预测的。然而,注意瞬脱的程度仅由T1准确性预测,而不是由任何其他表现测量指标预测。结果表明,注意瞬脱程度的个体差异并非源于有效的RSVP目标编码差异,也不能通过不同的信息处理能力得到很好的解释。