Mannion Richard J, Cross Justin, Bradley Peter, Coles Jonathan P, Chatfield Doris, Carpenter Adrian, Pickard John D, Menon David K, Hutchinson Peter J
Wolfson Brain Injury Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Jan;24(1):128-35. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0127.
While computed tomography (CT) is the appropriate technique for the urgent detection of hematomas and contusions in the cerebral hemispheres, it is much less effective at documenting diffuse injury and posterior fossa lesions, and is therefore only partially predictive of outcome. More recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used, particularly to examine posterior fossa structures, but the relationship between brainstem injury and outcome is unclear and the types of brainstem injury are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to use acute MRI to examine the types of brainstem injury following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their relationship to supratentorial injury. We also aimed to correlate these findings with outcome at 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score). Forty-six patients (mean age, 34 years, range, 16-70 years; 76% male) admitted to a regional neurocritical care unit with TBI requiring ventilation underwent CT and MRI (T2, FLAIR, gradient echo) scanning within 3 days (median, 1 day) of injury. GOS was ascertained by outpatient interview. Brainstem lesions were detected in 13 patients by MRI, only two of which were detected by CT. Eleven out of 13 patients with brainstem injury had an unfavorable outcome (death, vegetative state, or severe disability), of whom five died. Of the 33 patients without brainstem lesions, 18 had an unfavorable outcome, of whom four died. The direct relationship between brainstem lesions and unfavorable outcome was statistically significant (p < 0.05, chi-squared test). With regard to supratentorial injury, all but two brainstem lesions were seen either in the context of severe diffuse axonal injury or a significant mass lesion, and all of these patients had a poor outcome. However, the two patients with brainstem injury and good outcome had relatively few supratentorial abnormalities. From these observations, we have devised a simple classification system that is useful clinically and has potential associations with outcome. Poor prognosis is common following major TBI but is more common in those with brainstem injury. However, brainstem injury is not an absolute indicator of poor outcome. Understanding the anatomy and extent of brainstem injury, as well as its relationship to supratentorial abnormalities, will facilitate a more accurate use of early MRI as a prognostic tool and assist in the counseling of families.
虽然计算机断层扫描(CT)是紧急检测大脑半球血肿和挫伤的合适技术,但在记录弥漫性损伤和后颅窝病变方面效果要差得多,因此只能部分预测预后。最近,磁共振成像(MRI)已被用于,特别是检查后颅窝结构,但脑干损伤与预后之间的关系尚不清楚,对脑干损伤的类型也了解甚少。本研究的目的是使用急性MRI来检查严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后脑干损伤的类型及其与幕上损伤的关系。我们还旨在将这些发现与6个月时的预后(格拉斯哥预后量表[GOS]评分)相关联。46例因TBI入住区域神经重症监护病房且需要通气的患者(平均年龄34岁,范围16 - 70岁;76%为男性)在受伤后3天(中位数1天)内接受了CT和MRI(T2、FLAIR、梯度回波)扫描。通过门诊访谈确定GOS。MRI在13例患者中检测到脑干病变,其中仅2例通过CT检测到。13例脑干损伤患者中有11例预后不良(死亡、植物状态或严重残疾),其中5例死亡。在33例无脑干病变的患者中,18例预后不良,其中4例死亡。脑干病变与不良预后之间的直接关系具有统计学意义(p < 0.05,卡方检验)。关于幕上损伤,除2例脑干病变外,所有病变均见于严重弥漫性轴索损伤或明显的占位性病变背景下,且所有这些患者预后均较差。然而,2例脑干损伤且预后良好的患者幕上异常相对较少。基于这些观察结果,我们设计了一个简单的分类系统,该系统在临床上有用且与预后可能相关。重度TBI后预后不良很常见,但在脑干损伤患者中更常见。然而,脑干损伤并非预后不良的绝对指标。了解脑干损伤的解剖结构和范围及其与幕上异常的关系,将有助于更准确地将早期MRI用作预后工具,并协助为家属提供咨询。