Aplin Stephanie, Baines David, DE Lima Jonathan
The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Mar;17(3):216-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02094.x.
The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grading System is widely used to describe preoperative physical status. Inconsistency of grading between anesthetists has been demonstrated in studies using hypothetical adult patient scenarios. We aimed to investigate the use and interrater reliability of the ASA Grading System in pediatric anesthesia practice.
A two-part questionnaire was mailed to all 176 current members of the Society of Paediatric Anaesthesia in New Zealand and Australia (SPANZA). The first part of the questionnaire obtained information regarding type of practice, use of the ASA Grading System, opinions regarding grading systems in general and opinions as to the limitations of the ASA System. In Part II, respondents were presented with 15 hypothetical patient scenarios and asked to grade them using the ASA System. The scenarios were designed to cover a range of ages and conditions common in pediatric practice.
There were 130 replies (73.9%) after two mailings. The majority of respondents had been in predominantly pediatric practice for >5 years, had read the ASA Grading System within the last 2 years, and used it regularly. However, 30% modified the grading system for use in pediatrics. Many limitations of the ASA System in pediatric practice were identified. There was considerable lack of consistency in the grading of the hypothetical patient scenarios, with each scenario receiving at least three different ASA gradings. Case scenarios involving trauma or airway compromise were associated with greater inconsistency. There was no demonstrable correlation between grading consistency and patient age, familiarity with the ASA Grading System or experience of the anesthetist.
The ASA Grading System shows poor interrater reliability in pediatric practice, as it does in adults. This should be borne in mind when using the ASA System for clinical or scientific work in pediatrics. A physical status grading system developed specifically for use in pediatrics may reduce inconsistency.
美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级系统被广泛用于描述术前身体状况。在使用假设的成年患者场景的研究中,已证明麻醉医师之间的分级存在不一致性。我们旨在调查ASA分级系统在儿科麻醉实践中的使用情况和评分者间信度。
向新西兰和澳大利亚儿科麻醉学会(SPANZA)的所有176名现任成员邮寄了一份两部分的问卷。问卷的第一部分获取了有关执业类型、ASA分级系统的使用情况、对一般分级系统的看法以及对ASA系统局限性的看法等信息。在第二部分中,向受访者展示了15个假设的患者场景,并要求他们使用ASA系统进行分级。这些场景旨在涵盖儿科实践中常见的一系列年龄和病情。
经过两次邮寄后,共收到130份回复(73.9%)。大多数受访者主要从事儿科麻醉工作超过5年,在过去2年内阅读过ASA分级系统,并经常使用它。然而,30%的人对该分级系统进行了修改以用于儿科。确定了ASA系统在儿科实践中的许多局限性。在假设的患者场景分级中存在相当大的不一致性,每个场景至少获得三种不同的ASA分级。涉及创伤或气道受损的病例场景存在更大的不一致性。分级一致性与患者年龄、对ASA分级系统的熟悉程度或麻醉医师的经验之间没有明显的相关性。
与成人情况一样,ASA分级系统在儿科实践中显示出较差的评分者间信度。在将ASA系统用于儿科临床或科研工作时应牢记这一点。专门为儿科使用而开发的身体状况分级系统可能会减少不一致性。