• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A machine-learning approach for decision support and risk stratification of pediatric perioperative patients based on the APRICOT dataset.基于 APRICOT 数据集的儿科围手术期患者决策支持和风险分层的机器学习方法。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Sep;33(9):710-719. doi: 10.1111/pan.14694. Epub 2023 May 21.
2
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
3
Development and validation of a machine learning ASA-score to identify candidates for comprehensive preoperative screening and risk stratification.用于识别全面术前筛查和风险分层候选者的机器学习美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分的开发与验证
J Clin Anesth. 2023 Aug;87:111103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111103. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
4
Prediction of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification from preoperative clinical text narratives using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理技术从术前临床文本叙述中预测美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02248-0.
5
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
6
Assessing the Utility of a Machine-Learning Model to Assist With the Assignment of the American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification in Pediatric Patients.评估机器学习模型在协助美国麻醉医师协会体格状况分类在儿科患者中的应用。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Nov 1;139(5):1017-1026. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006761. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
7
Utilizing Machine Learning Methods for Preoperative Prediction of Postsurgical Mortality and Intensive Care Unit Admission.利用机器学习方法预测术后死亡率和入住重症监护病房。
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):1133-1139. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003297.
8
Novel Preoperative Risk Stratification Using Digital Phenotyping Applying a Scalable Machine-Learning Approach.使用数字表型和可扩展机器学习方法进行新型术前风险分层
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jul 1;139(1):174-185. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006753. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
9
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Following Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: Model Development and Validation Study.基于机器学习的小儿心脏手术后急性肾损伤预测:模型开发与验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 5;25:e41142. doi: 10.2196/41142.
10
Incidence of severe critical events in paediatric anaesthesia in Scandinavia: Secondary analysis of Anaesthesia PRactice In Children Observational Trial (APRICOT).斯堪的纳维亚儿科麻醉严重危急事件发生率:小儿麻醉实践观察性试验(APRICOT)的二次分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 May;63(5):601-609. doi: 10.1111/aas.13333. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening Discovery and Application of Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology: A Report from the Anesthesia Research Council.加强人工智能在麻醉学中的发现与应用:麻醉研究委员会的报告
Anesthesiology. 2025 Apr 1;142(4):599-610. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005326. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
2
Machine Learning in Pediatric Healthcare: Current Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.儿科医疗保健中的机器学习:当前趋势、挑战及未来方向。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 26;14(3):807. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030807.
3
Novel Preoperative Risk Stratification Using Digital Phenotyping Applying a Scalable Machine-Learning Approach.使用数字表型和可扩展机器学习方法进行新型术前风险分层
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jul 1;139(1):174-185. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006753. Epub 2023 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The Perioperative Human Digital Twin.围手术期人体数字孪生模型
Anesth Analg. 2022 Apr 1;134(4):885-892. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005916.
2
Prevalence of PErioperAtive CHildhood obesitY in children undergoing general anaesthesia in the UK: a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study.英国接受全身麻醉的儿童围手术期肥胖患病率:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Dec;127(6):953-961. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.07.034. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
3
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Research: Current State, Future Prospects, and Examples in Perioperative and Critical Care.机器学习与人工智能在儿科研究中的应用:现状、未来展望及围手术期与重症监护领域的实例
J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221S:S3-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.039.
4
Realistically Integrating Machine Learning Into Clinical Practice: A Road Map of Opportunities, Challenges, and a Potential Future.将机器学习切实融入临床实践:机遇、挑战与潜在未来的路线图
Anesth Analg. 2020 May;130(5):1115-1118. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004575.
5
Incidence of paediatric unplanned day-case admissions in the UK and Ireland: a prospective multicentre observational study.英国和爱尔兰儿童非计划日间手术入院率:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Apr;124(4):463-472. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.11.035. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
6
Prospective External Validation of the Pediatric Risk Assessment Score in Predicting Perioperative Mortality in Children Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.前瞻性验证儿科风险评分在预测非心脏手术患儿围手术期死亡率中的作用。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Oct;129(4):1014-1020. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004197.
7
Pediatric Risk Stratification Is Improved by Integrating Both Patient Comorbidities and Intrinsic Surgical Risk.儿科风险分层通过整合患者合并症和内在手术风险得到改善。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):971-980. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002659.
8
Perioperative respiratory adverse event risk assessment in children with upper respiratory tract infection: Validation of the COLDS score.上呼吸道感染患儿围手术期呼吸不良事件风险评估:COLDS评分的验证
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Nov;28(11):1007-1014. doi: 10.1111/pan.13491. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
9
Rates of Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events Among Caucasian and African American Children Undergoing General Anesthesia.全麻下进行手术的白种人和非裔美国儿童围术期呼吸不良事件发生率。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jul;127(1):181-187. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003430.
10
Interrater variability in ASA physical status assignment: an analysis in the pediatric cancer setting.ASA 体格状况评估中的评定者间变异性:儿科癌症环境下的分析。
J Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):211-218. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2463-2. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

基于 APRICOT 数据集的儿科围手术期患者决策支持和风险分层的机器学习方法。

A machine-learning approach for decision support and risk stratification of pediatric perioperative patients based on the APRICOT dataset.

机构信息

Center for Pediatric Data Science and Analytics Methodology, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA.

Department of Anesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Sep;33(9):710-719. doi: 10.1111/pan.14694. Epub 2023 May 21.

DOI:10.1111/pan.14694
PMID:37211981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11485222/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pediatric anesthesia has evolved to a high level of patient safety, yet a small chance remains for serious perioperative complications, even in those traditionally considered at low risk. In practice, prediction of at-risk patients currently relies on the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) score, despite reported inconsistencies with this method.

AIMS

The goal of this study was to develop predictive models that can classify children as low risk for anesthesia at the time of surgical booking and after anesthetic assessment on the procedure day.

METHODS

Our dataset was derived from APRICOT, a prospective observational cohort study conducted by 261 European institutions in 2014 and 2015. We included only the first procedure, ASA-PS classification I to III, and perioperative adverse events not classified as drug errors, reducing the total number of records to 30 325 with an adverse event rate of 4.43%. From this dataset, a stratified train:test split of 70:30 was used to develop predictive machine learning algorithms that could identify children in ASA-PS class I to III at low risk for severe perioperative critical events that included respiratory, cardiac, allergic, and neurological complications.

RESULTS

Our selected models achieved accuracies of >0.9, areas under the receiver operating curve of 0.6-0.7, and negative predictive values >95%. Gradient boosting models were the best performing for both the booking phase and the day-of-surgery phase.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates that prediction of patients at low risk of critical PAEs can be made on an individual, rather than population-based, level by using machine learning. Our approach yielded two models that accommodate wide clinical variability and, with further development, are potentially generalizable to many surgical centers.

摘要

背景

儿科麻醉已发展到高度的患者安全水平,但即使在传统上被认为低风险的患者中,仍存在发生严重围手术期并发症的小概率。在实践中,目前预测高危患者主要依赖美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)评分,尽管该方法存在不一致性。

目的

本研究的目的是开发预测模型,以便在手术预约时和麻醉评估当天对患儿进行分类,确定其是否为低风险麻醉。

方法

我们的数据集来源于 APRICOT,这是一项由 261 家欧洲机构于 2014 年和 2015 年进行的前瞻性观察性队列研究。我们仅纳入 ASA-PS 分级 I 至 III 的首次手术和未归类为药物错误的围手术期不良事件,使总记录数减少到 30325 例,不良事件发生率为 4.43%。从这个数据集中,采用 70:30 的分层训练-测试分割方法,开发预测机器学习算法,以识别 ASA-PS 分级 I 至 III 的患儿,这些患儿发生包括呼吸、心脏、过敏和神经并发症在内的严重围手术期危急事件的风险低。

结果

我们选择的模型在预订阶段和手术当天阶段的准确性均>0.9,接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.6-0.7,阴性预测值>95%。梯度提升模型在这两个阶段的性能最佳。

结论

这项工作表明,通过机器学习可以对患者进行个体化而非基于人群的低风险危急 PAE 预测。我们的方法产生了两个模型,可以适应广泛的临床变异性,并且经过进一步开发,有可能推广到许多外科中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/e8b93e654e9e/nihms-2026490-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/fe9cbf61db7a/nihms-2026490-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/43b6e139e729/nihms-2026490-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/6910885bacb8/nihms-2026490-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/e8b93e654e9e/nihms-2026490-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/fe9cbf61db7a/nihms-2026490-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/43b6e139e729/nihms-2026490-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/6910885bacb8/nihms-2026490-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16cc/11485222/e8b93e654e9e/nihms-2026490-f0004.jpg