Suppr超能文献

基于实验室的血管吻合训练:一项随机对照试验,评估实验台模型逼真度和训练水平对技能习得的影响。

Laboratory-based vascular anastomosis training: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of bench model fidelity and level of training on skill acquisition.

作者信息

Sidhu Ravi S, Park Jason, Brydges Ryan, MacRae Helen M, Dubrowski Adam

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2007 Feb;45(2):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.040.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there is growing evidence that practice on bench model simulators can improve the acquisition of technical skill in surgery, the degree to which these models have to approximate real-world conditions (model fidelity) to optimize learning is unclear. Previous research suggests that low-fidelity models may be adequate for novice learners. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of model fidelity and surgical expertise on the acquisition of vascular anastomosis skill.

METHODS

Twenty-seven surgical residents participated in this institutional review board-approved study. Junior residents (postgraduate year 1 and 2) and senior residents (postgraduate year 4 or higher) were randomized into two groups: low-fidelity (n = 13) and high-fidelity (n = 14) model training. Both groups were given a 3-hour hands-on training session: the low-fidelity group used plastic models, and the high-fidelity group used human cadaver arms (brachial arteries) to practice graft-to-arterial anastomosis. One week later, all subjects participated in an animal laboratory in which they performed a single vascular anastomosis on a live, anesthetized pig (femoral artery). A blinded vascular surgeon scored candidate performance in the animal laboratory by using previously validated end points, including a checklist and final product analysis score.

RESULTS

Acquisition of skill was significantly affected by model fidelity and level of training as measured by both the checklist (P = .03) and final product analysis (P = .01; Kruskal-Wallis). Specifically, junior residents practicing on high-fidelity models scored better on the checklist (P = .05) and final product analysis (P = .04). Senior residents practicing on high-fidelity models scored better on final product analysis (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Training in the laboratory does improve skill when assessed in a realistic setting. Both expertise groups showed better skill transfer from the bench model to live animals when practicing on high-fidelity models. For vascular anastomosis, it is important to provide appropriate model fidelity for trainees of different abilities to optimize the effectiveness of bench model training.

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多的证据表明在模拟实验台上进行练习可以提高手术技术技能的获得,但这些模型必须在多大程度上接近真实世界的条件(模型逼真度)以优化学习尚不清楚。先前的研究表明,低逼真度模型可能适合新手学习者。本研究的目的是评估模型逼真度和手术专业知识对血管吻合技能获得的影响。

方法

27名外科住院医师参与了这项经机构审查委员会批准的研究。初级住院医师(研究生一年级和二年级)和高级住院医师(研究生四年级或更高年级)被随机分为两组:低逼真度组(n = 13)和高逼真度组(n = 14)进行模型训练。两组均接受3小时的实践培训:低逼真度组使用塑料模型,高逼真度组使用人体尸体手臂(肱动脉)练习移植物与动脉的吻合。一周后,所有受试者参加动物实验室实验,在一只麻醉的活猪(股动脉)上进行单次血管吻合。一名不知情的血管外科医生通过使用先前验证的终点指标,包括检查表和最终产品分析评分,对动物实验室中受试者的表现进行评分。

结果

通过检查表(P = .03)和最终产品分析(P = .01;Kruskal-Wallis检验)测量,技能的获得受到模型逼真度和训练水平的显著影响。具体而言,在高逼真度模型上练习的初级住院医师在检查表(P = .05)和最终产品分析(P = .04)中得分更高。在高逼真度模型上练习的高级住院医师在最终产品分析中得分更高(P < .05)。

结论

在现实环境中评估时,实验室培训确实能提高技能。当在高逼真度模型上练习时,两个专业组从实验台模型到活体动物的技能转移都更好。对于血管吻合,为不同能力的受训者提供适当的模型逼真度对于优化实验台模型训练的效果很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验