Ezzo Jeanette, Haraldsson Bodhi G, Gross Anita R, Myers Cynthia D, Morien Annie, Goldsmith Charlie H, Bronfort Gert, Peloso Paul M
JPS Enterprises, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):353-62. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254099.07294.21.
Systematic review.
To assess the effects of massage on pain, function, patient satisfaction, cost of care, and adverse events in adults with neck pain.
Neck pain is common, disabling, and costly. Massage is a commonly used modality for the treatment of neck pain.
We searched several databases without language restriction from their inception to September 2004. We included randomized and quasirandomized trials. Two reviewers independently identified studies, abstracted data, and assessed quality. We calculated the relative risks and standardized mean differences on primary outcomes. Trials could not be statistically pooled because of heterogeneity in treatment and control groups. Therefore, a levels-of-evidence approach was used to synthesize results.
Overall, 19 trials were included, with 12/19 receiving low-quality scores. Descriptions of the massage intervention, massage professional's credentials, or experience were frequently missing. Six trials examined massage as a stand-alone treatment. The results were inconclusive. Results were also inconclusive in 14 trials that used massage as part of a multimodal intervention because none were designed such that the relative contribution of massage could be ascertained.
No recommendations for practice can be made at this time because the effectiveness of massage for neck pain remains uncertain. Pilot studies are needed to characterize massage treatment (frequency, duration, number of sessions, and massage technique) and establish the optimal treatment to be used in subsequent larger trials that examine the effect of massage as either a stand-alone treatment or part of a multimodal intervention. For multimodal interventions, factorial designs are needed to determine the relative contribution of massage. Future reports of trials should improve reporting of the concealment of allocation, blinding of outcome assessor, adverse events, and massage characteristics. Standards of reporting for massage interventions, similar to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, are needed. Both short and long-term follow-up are needed.
系统评价。
评估按摩对成人颈痛患者的疼痛、功能、患者满意度、护理成本及不良事件的影响。
颈痛常见、致残且代价高昂。按摩是治疗颈痛常用的一种方式。
检索多个数据库,检索时间从建库至2004年9月,无语言限制。纳入随机和半随机试验。两名评价者独立识别研究、提取数据并评估质量。计算主要结局的相对危险度和标准化均数差。由于治疗组和对照组存在异质性,无法进行统计学合并。因此,采用证据等级法综合结果。
共纳入19项试验,其中12/19项质量评分较低。按摩干预的描述、按摩专业人员的资质或经验常常缺失。6项试验将按摩作为单一治疗方法进行研究,结果尚无定论。14项试验将按摩作为多模式干预的一部分,结果也尚无定论,因为没有一项试验设计能够确定按摩的相对作用。
目前无法给出实践建议,因为按摩治疗颈痛的有效性仍不确定。需要进行预试验来明确按摩治疗(频率、持续时间、疗程数和按摩技术),并确定在后续更大规模试验中作为单一治疗方法或多模式干预一部分使用的最佳治疗方案。对于多模式干预,需要采用析因设计来确定按摩的相对作用。未来试验报告应改进分配隐藏、结局评估者设盲、不良事件和按摩特征的报告。需要类似于《报告试验的统一标准》的按摩干预报告标准。需要进行短期和长期随访。