Suppr超能文献

采用混合式学习策略进行人体解剖学教学的有效性。

Effectiveness of using blended learning strategies for teaching and learning human anatomy.

作者信息

Pereira José A, Pleguezuelos Eulogio, Merí Alex, Molina-Ros Antoni, Molina-Tomás M Carmen, Masdeu Carlos

机构信息

Department of Experimental Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2007 Feb;41(2):189-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02672.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to implement innovative teaching methods--blended learning strategies--that include the use of new information technologies in the teaching of human anatomy and to analyse both the impact of these strategies on academic performance, and the degree of user satisfaction.

METHODS

The study was carried out among students in Year 1 of the biology degree curriculum (human biology profile) at Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona. Two groups of students were tested on knowledge of the anatomy of the locomotor system and results compared between groups. Blended learning strategies were employed in 1 group (BL group, n = 69); the other (TT group; n = 65) received traditional teaching aided by complementary material that could be accessed on the Internet. Both groups were evaluated using the same types of examination.

RESULTS

The average marks presented statistically significant differences (BL 6.3 versus TT 5.0; P < 0.0001). The percentage pass rate for the subject in the first call was higher in the BL group (87.9% versus 71.4%; P = 0.02), reflecting a lower incidence of students who failed to sit the examination (BL 4.3% versus TT 13.8%; P = 0.05). There were no differences regarding overall satisfaction with the teaching received.

CONCLUSIONS

Blended learning was more effective than traditional teaching for teaching human anatomy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在实施创新教学方法——混合式学习策略,即在人体解剖学教学中运用新信息技术,并分析这些策略对学业成绩的影响以及用户满意度。

方法

该研究在巴塞罗那庞培法布拉大学攻读生物学学位课程(人类生物学方向)一年级的学生中开展。两组学生接受了运动系统解剖学知识测试,并对两组结果进行比较。一组(混合式学习组,n = 69)采用混合式学习策略;另一组(传统教学组,n = 65)接受借助可在互联网上获取的补充材料的传统教学。两组均使用相同类型的考试进行评估。

结果

平均分存在统计学显著差异(混合式学习组6.3分,传统教学组5.0分;P < 0.0001)。首次考试中该学科的及格率在混合式学习组更高(87.9% 对71.4%;P = 0.02),这反映出缺考学生的发生率更低(混合式学习组4.3% 对传统教学组13.8%;P = 0.05)。在对所接受教学的总体满意度方面没有差异。

结论

在人体解剖学教学中,混合式学习比传统教学更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验