Bunik Maya, Glazner Judith E, Chandramouli Vijayalaxmi, Emsermann Caroline Bublitz, Hegarty Teresa, Kempe Allison
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Pediatrics. 2007 Feb;119(2):e305-13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1511.
After-hours call centers have been shown to provide appropriate triage with high levels of parental and provider satisfaction. However, few data are available on the costs and outcomes of call centers from the perspective of the health care system. With this study we sought to determine these outcomes.
Parents who called the Pediatric After-hours Call Center at the Children's Hospital of Denver from March 19, 2004, to April 19, 2004, were asked an open-ended question before triage: "We would like to know, what you would have done if you could not have called our call center this evening/today?"
The response rate for the survey was 77.8% (N = 8980). Parents reported that they would have (1) gone to an emergency department or urgent care facility (46%), (2) treated the child at home (21%), (3) called a physician's office the next day (12%), (4) asked another person for advice (13%), (5) consulted a written source (2%), or (6) other (7%). Of the 46% of callers who would have sought emergent care, only 13.5% subsequently were given an urgent disposition by the call center. Fifteen percent of cases in which the parents would have stayed at home were given an urgent disposition by nurses. Assuming that all callers followed the advice provided, the estimated savings per call, based on local costs, was 42.61 dollars per call. Savings based on Medical Expenditure Panel Survey national payment data were 56.26 dollars per call.
Two thirds of the cases in which parents reported initial intent to go to an emergency department or urgent care facility were not deemed urgent by the call center, whereas 15% of calls from parents who intended to stay home were deemed urgent. If call-center triage recommendations were followed in even half of all cases, then these results would translate into substantial cost savings for the health care system.
非工作时间呼叫中心已被证明能提供恰当的分诊服务,且家长和医护人员满意度较高。然而,从医疗系统角度来看,关于呼叫中心的成本和结果的数据却很少。通过本研究,我们试图确定这些结果。
2004年3月19日至2004年4月19日期间拨打丹佛儿童医院儿科非工作时间呼叫中心的家长,在分诊前被问到一个开放式问题:“我们想知道,如果今晚/今天你无法拨打我们的呼叫中心,你会怎么做?”
调查的回复率为77.8%(N = 8980)。家长报告称他们会(1)前往急诊科或紧急护理机构(46%),(2)在家中治疗孩子(21%),(3)第二天致电医生办公室(12%),(4)向他人寻求建议(13%),(5)查阅书面资料(2%),或(6)其他(7%)。在本会寻求紧急护理的46%的来电者中,只有13.5%随后被呼叫中心判定为紧急情况。家长本会留在家中的病例中有15%被护士判定为紧急情况。假设所有来电者都遵循提供的建议,根据当地成本估算,每次呼叫节省的费用为42.61美元。根据医疗支出小组调查的全国支付数据,每次呼叫节省的费用为56.26美元。
家长报告最初打算前往急诊科或紧急护理机构的病例中,三分之二未被呼叫中心判定为紧急情况,而原本打算留在家中的家长来电中有15%被判定为紧急情况。如果所有病例中哪怕只有一半遵循呼叫中心的分诊建议,那么这些结果将为医疗系统带来可观的成本节省。