McGill University, Medicine, 687 Pine Ave W, V-Building, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1.
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;59(12):e550-7.
To evaluate the feasibility of a call-in centre to deliver colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in primary care through self-administered fecal occult blood testing (FOBT).
Four-month intervention study (September 2010 to January 2011) with randomly selected follow-up interviews.
The family medicine clinics of 3 hospitals in Montreal, Que.
Letters from doctors invited their patients to contact the call-in centre (N = 761). Eligible patients agreeing to FOBT were sent testing kits that could be returned by mail (N = 100). Randomly selected patients (N = 36) were interviewed to explore the reasons why they did not contact the call-in centre, or why they did or did not adhere to FOBT.
Feasibility was assessed by the proportions of patients who contacted the call-in centre, who were eligible for FOBT, and who adhered to FOBT; and by the time between invitation mail-out and contact with the call-in centre, initial telephone contact and receipt of the signed consent form, and FOBT kit mail-out and receipt of the kit by the laboratory. Hierarchical logistic regression evaluated the effect of patient characteristics on feasibility indicators, adjusting for clustering by physician and centre.
Of 761 patients (61.6% female, mean age 61.0 years), 250 (32.9%) contacted the call-in centre, of whom 100 (40.0%) were eligible for and consented to FOBT; 62 (62.0%) of these patients adhered to FOBT. Median (interquartile range) time from invitation mail-out to call-in centre contact was 21 (7 to 29) days, from initial telephone contact to receipt of the signed consent form was 24 (10 to 38) days, and from FOBT kit mail-out to receipt at the laboratory was 23 (18 to 32) days. With the exception of previous cancer diagnosis, patient characteristics were not associated with feasibility indicators. Of the 115 (46.0%) patients determined to be ineligible for FOBT screening, 111 (96.5%) were up to date with or already scheduled for screening.
Feasibility of the call-in centre was demonstrated. Targeting screening-eligible individuals or coupling a call-in service with another evidence-based CRC screening improvement strategy might further improve uptake of fecal testing.
评估通过电话咨询中心向初级保健机构提供结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的可行性,方法是通过自我管理粪便潜血试验(FOBT)。
随机选择随访访谈的为期四个月的干预研究(2010 年 9 月至 2011 年 1 月)。
蒙特利尔的 3 家医院的家庭医学诊所。
医生的邀请信邀请患者联系电话咨询中心(N=761)。同意进行 FOBT 的合格患者会收到可通过邮件退回的检测试剂盒(N=100)。随机选择(N=36)名患者进行访谈,以探讨他们为何未联系电话咨询中心,或为何未坚持进行 FOBT。
通过联系电话咨询中心、符合 FOBT 条件和坚持进行 FOBT 的患者比例,以及从邀请函发出到与电话咨询中心联系、初始电话联系和收到签字同意书、FOBT 试剂盒发出和实验室收到试剂盒之间的时间,来评估可行性。采用分层逻辑回归评估患者特征对可行性指标的影响,同时按医生和中心进行聚类调整。
在 761 名患者(61.6%为女性,平均年龄 61.0 岁)中,有 250 名(32.9%)患者联系了电话咨询中心,其中 100 名(40.0%)符合条件并同意进行 FOBT;其中 62 名(62.0%)患者坚持进行了 FOBT。从邀请函发出到电话咨询中心联系的中位(四分位距)时间为 21 天(7-29 天),从初始电话联系到收到签字同意书的时间为 24 天(10-38 天),从 FOBT 试剂盒发出到实验室收到的时间为 23 天(18-32 天)。除了既往癌症诊断外,患者特征与可行性指标无关。在 115 名(46.0%)被确定为不符合 FOBT 筛查条件的患者中,111 名(96.5%)的筛查是及时的或已经安排好了。
电话咨询中心的可行性得到了证实。针对筛查合格的个体,或者将电话咨询服务与其他基于证据的 CRC 筛查改善策略结合起来,可能会进一步提高粪便检测的接受率。