Rubin David M, O'Reilly Amanda L R, Luan Xianqun, Localio A Russell
Pediatric Generalist Research Group, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Pediatrics. 2007 Feb;119(2):336-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1995.
The problems children have upon entering foster care can potentially explain prior research findings that frequent placement changes are associated with poor outcomes. This study sought to disentangle this cascading relationship in order to identify the independent impact of placement stability on behavioral outcomes downstream.
DESIGN/METHODS: Placement stability over the first 18 months in out-of-home care for 729 children from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being was categorized as early stability (stable placement within 45 days), late stability (stable placement beyond 45 days), or unstable (never achieving stability). Propensity scores predicting placement instability based on baseline attributes were divided into risk categories and added to a logistic regression model to examine the independent association between placement stability and behavioral well-being using the Child Behavior Checklist and temperament scores from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.
Half (52%) of the children achieved early stability, 19% achieved later stability, and 28% remained unstable. Early stabilizers were more likely to be young, have normal baseline behavior, have no prior history with child welfare, and have birth parents without mental health problems. After accounting for baseline attributes, stability remained an important predictor of well-being at 18 months. Unstable children were more likely to have behavior problems than children who achieved early stability across every level of risk for instability. Among low-risk children, the probability of behavioral problems among early stabilizers was 22%, compared to 36% among unstable children, showing a 63% increase in behavior problems due to instability alone.
Children in foster care experience placement instability unrelated to their baseline problems, and this instability has a significant impact on their behavioral well-being. This finding would support the development of interventions that promote placement stability as a means to improve outcomes among youth entering care.
儿童进入寄养照护时所面临的问题可能有助于解释先前的研究结果,即频繁更换安置环境与不良后果相关。本研究旨在理清这种级联关系,以确定安置稳定性对下游行为结果的独立影响。
设计/方法:从《全国儿童与青少年幸福调查》中选取729名儿童,将其在家庭外照护的前18个月中的安置稳定性分为早期稳定(45天内安置稳定)、晚期稳定(45天后安置稳定)或不稳定(从未实现稳定)。根据基线属性预测安置不稳定的倾向得分被分为风险类别,并添加到逻辑回归模型中,以使用《儿童行为清单》和《全国青年纵向调查》中的气质得分来检验安置稳定性与行为幸福感之间的独立关联。
一半(52%)的儿童实现了早期稳定,19%实现了晚期稳定,28%仍不稳定。早期实现稳定的儿童更有可能年龄较小、基线行为正常、没有儿童福利方面的既往史,且亲生父母没有心理健康问题。在考虑基线属性后,稳定性仍然是18个月时幸福感的重要预测因素。在每个不稳定风险水平上,不稳定儿童比早期实现稳定的儿童更有可能出现行为问题。在低风险儿童中,早期实现稳定的儿童出现行为问题的概率为22%,而不稳定儿童为36%,这表明仅因不稳定导致行为问题增加了63%。
寄养儿童经历的安置不稳定与其基线问题无关,这种不稳定对他们的行为幸福感有重大影响。这一发现将支持开发促进安置稳定的干预措施,以此作为改善进入照护系统的青少年结局的一种手段。