Secmeer Gulten, Devrim Ilker, Kara Ates, Ceyhan Mehmet, Cengiz Bulent, Kutluk Tezer, Buyukpamukcu Munevver, Yetgin Sevgi, Tuncer Murat, Uludag Ali Kerem, Tezer Hasan, Yildirim Inci
Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007 Feb;29(2):107-11. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3180320b5b.
In clinical practice, when neutropenic-fever patients present with no microbiologically and clinically defined infection, the risk of underestimating an occult infection is of major concern, the clinicians have to make a decision on when to modify antibiotic therapy. Hence, a reliable, specific, and sensitive marker, which is regulated independently from the leukocyte count and the underlying disease, is needed for the early diagnosis of infections in cases of neutropenic fever. We have evaluated the diagnostic and follow-up value of procalcitonin (PCT) compared with C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in documenting the infection in neutropenic-fever patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy, as evidenced by the durational change in these parameters in the presence of defined infection. Forty-nine patients, who had 60 febrile episodes, and who were hospitalized in the Hacettepe University Ihsan Doğramaci Children's Hospital between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2005 were included in this prospective study. All patients had been diagnosed with neutropenic fever after intensive chemotherapy. In our study, PCT and CRP levels were significantly higher in neutropenic-fever patients (group I and group II separately) than in control patients (P<0.001) throughout the study period; but erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels did not show any significant difference (P>0.05). In sequential analyses of patients without documented infections, the median of PCT concentrations shows a tendency to fall after the 8th hour of onset of fever, whereas in patients with documented infections PCT concentrations fell after the 48th hour. In conclusion, our study suggests that PCT, when measured periodically, is a more useful diagnostic inflammation parameter in pediatric neutropenic-fever patients than CRP, both in estimating the severity of the infection and, the duration and origin of the fever. Hence, PCT might be helpful when deciding on initial therapy modification.
在临床实践中,当中性粒细胞减少伴发热的患者没有微生物学和临床明确的感染时,低估隐匿性感染的风险是主要关注点,临床医生必须决定何时调整抗生素治疗。因此,对于中性粒细胞减少伴发热患者的感染早期诊断,需要一种可靠、特异且敏感的标志物,其不受白细胞计数和基础疾病的独立影响。我们评估了降钙素原(PCT)与C反应蛋白(CRP)及红细胞沉降率相比,在记录接受强化化疗的中性粒细胞减少伴发热患者感染情况方面的诊断和随访价值,这些参数在明确感染存在时的持续变化证明了这一点。本前瞻性研究纳入了2004年1月1日至2005年1月1日期间在哈杰泰佩大学伊尚·多格拉马西儿童医院住院的49例患者,这些患者有60次发热发作。所有患者在强化化疗后均被诊断为中性粒细胞减少伴发热。在我们的研究中,在整个研究期间,中性粒细胞减少伴发热患者(分别为I组和II组)的PCT和CRP水平显著高于对照组患者(P<0.001);但红细胞沉降率水平未显示任何显著差异(P>0.05)。在对无感染记录患者的连续分析中,PCT浓度中位数在发热开始后第8小时显示出下降趋势,而在有感染记录的患者中,PCT浓度在第48小时后下降。总之,我们的研究表明,定期测量时,PCT在评估小儿中性粒细胞减少伴发热患者感染的严重程度、发热持续时间和发热来源方面,是比CRP更有用的诊断炎症参数。因此,在决定初始治疗调整时,PCT可能会有所帮助。