Mørkeberg J C, Sheng H P, Huggins R A
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Children's Nutrition Research Center, Houston, Texas.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1992 Jan;199(1):68-74. doi: 10.3181/00379727-199-43331.
Use of either urine or saliva samples to estimate extracellular water volume was investigated in 10 men using nonradioactive bromide (Br) and in seven newborn piglets using radioactive Br (82Br) and chloride (36Cl). The relation to Br to Cl concentrations in urine enabled an estimation of Br dilution volume from human urine (267 +/- 42 ml/kg, mean +/- SD) that was not significantly different (P = 1.0) from the Br dilution volume calculated from plasma Br concentration (268 +/- 20 ml/kg). Although the Br dilution volume estimated from saliva was not different from that of plasma, the error in the estimates of Br dilution volume from saliva was too large (mean difference, -36 +/- 64 ml/kg) to make its use practical. The data from piglets showed good agreement between 82Br and 36Cl dilution volumes calculated from 4-hr plasma samples (356 +/- 14 ml/kg and 347 +2- 12 ml/kg; P greater than 0.1) and between 82Br dilution volumes calculated from urine 82Br:36Cl and plasma 82Br (360 +/- 31 ml/kg and 356 +/- 14 ml/kg; P greater than 0.1). Extracellular water volume can be estimated in both adult and young animals using the Br dilution volume calculated from urine samples. It requires (i) two urine collections: one before and one 4 to 8 hr after administration of Br; (ii) a measurement or estimate of plasma Cl concentration; and (iii) a correction factor that describes the relationship of the ratio of Br to Cl in urine to that ratio in plasma.
