Mengel M, Gwinner W, Schwarz A, Bajeski R, Franz I, Bröcker V, Becker T, Neipp M, Klempnauer J, Haller H, Kreipe H
Institut fuer Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
Am J Transplant. 2007 Feb;7(2):356-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01635.x.
In renal transplantation, clinical decisions are based primarily on the Banff classification of biopsies. However, the incorporation of 'minor or nonspecific' cellular infiltrates into the Banff classification and their interpretation is uncertain. We analyzed 833 protocol and 306 indicated biopsies to test whether such infiltrates are harmless or whether they have a bearing on outcomes. We characterized morphology, localization and cellular composition of infiltrates, and correlated these findings to the Banff classification and allograft outcome. We found that protocol biopsies had the same prevalence of infiltrates as indication biopsies (87% vs. 87%). Diffuse cortical infiltrates, the hallmark of cellular rejection were more common in indication biopsies and related to tubulitis and a rise in serum creatinine. However, in biopsies with cellular rejection according to Banff criteria, we observed an increase in all infiltrate types (specific and nonspecific) and all cell types (T cells, B cells, histiocytes). The only predictor of allograft function outcome was persistent inflammation in sequential biopsies, irrespective of type, localization and composition of the cellular infiltrates. As detected by sequential biopsies, persistence of any inflammation including those infiltrates currently not considered by the Banff classification should be regarded as a morphological correlate of ongoing allograft damage.
在肾移植中,临床决策主要基于活检的班夫分类。然而,将“轻微或非特异性”细胞浸润纳入班夫分类及其解读尚不确定。我们分析了833例常规活检和306例指征性活检,以检验此类浸润是否无害或是否与预后相关。我们对浸润的形态、定位和细胞组成进行了特征描述,并将这些发现与班夫分类和同种异体移植物预后相关联。我们发现,常规活检的浸润发生率与指征性活检相同(87%对87%)。弥漫性皮质浸润是细胞排斥的标志,在指征性活检中更为常见,且与肾小管炎和血清肌酐升高有关。然而,在根据班夫标准诊断为细胞排斥的活检中,我们观察到所有浸润类型(特异性和非特异性)和所有细胞类型(T细胞、B细胞、组织细胞)均增加。同种异体移植物功能预后的唯一预测因素是连续活检中的持续性炎症,无论细胞浸润的类型、定位和组成如何。通过连续活检检测发现,任何炎症的持续存在,包括那些目前班夫分类未考虑的浸润,都应被视为正在进行的同种异体移植物损伤的形态学相关指标。