Ichihashi Toru, Muto Takashi, Shibuya Koji
The Lion Foundation for Dental Health, 3--7, Honjo 1-chome, Sumida-ku, Tokyo 130-8644, Japan.
Ind Health. 2007 Jan;45(1):32-6. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.45.32.
This study was conducted to examine whether oral-health promotion programs provided as an occupational health service for employees were cost-beneficial for employers. The subjects were composed of 357 male workers (20-59 yr of age) who participated in oral-health promotion programs conducted at their workplaces between 1992 and 1997. The design of this study was a quasi-experimental study design in which the three programs (light: 1 visit; medium: 2-4 visits; and heavy: 5-6 visits) were compared through cost-benefit analysis conducted from the viewpoint of the employers. The programs consisted of oral-health checkups by dentists and oral-health education, including that on the proper brushing method, by dental hygienists. The costs of the program included direct costs for the payment of oral-health-care staff and for teaching materials, and indirect costs for the time for employee participation in the program (20 min/employee per visit). The accumulated dental expenses for the seven years were used to calculate benefits, which were determined, based on the differences between 0 visits and each program. The benefit/cost ratios of the three programs were -2.45, 1.46, and 0.73, respectively. These results suggest that a worksite oral-health promotion program of medium frequency is cost-beneficial for employers.
本研究旨在探讨作为职业健康服务为员工提供的口腔健康促进项目对雇主而言是否具有成本效益。研究对象为357名男性工人(年龄在20至59岁之间),他们于1992年至1997年间在工作场所参加了口腔健康促进项目。本研究的设计为准实验研究设计,通过从雇主的角度进行成本效益分析,对三个项目(轻度:1次就诊;中度:2至4次就诊;重度:5至6次就诊)进行比较。这些项目包括由牙医进行的口腔健康检查以及由口腔保健员进行的口腔健康教育,包括正确刷牙方法的教育。项目成本包括支付口腔保健工作人员的直接成本和教材成本,以及员工参与项目所需时间的间接成本(每次就诊每位员工20分钟)。用七年累计的牙科费用来计算效益,效益是根据零次就诊与每个项目之间的差异确定的。这三个项目的效益/成本比分别为-2.45、1.46和0.73。这些结果表明,中等频率的工作场所口腔健康促进项目对雇主具有成本效益。