Suppr超能文献

高危患者(欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统评分≥6)的非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients (EuroSCORE >/= 6).

作者信息

Lahtinen J, Biancari F, Rimpiläinen J, Kytökorpi R, Mosorin M, Rainio P, Cresti R, Juvonen T, Lepojärvi M

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;55(1):13-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924484.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review the results of off-pump (OPCAB) versus conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (CCAB) in high-risk patients.

METHODS

In a cohort of patients with an additive EuroSCORE >/= 6, 67 underwent OPCAB and 112 underwent CCAB.

RESULTS

Thirty-day postoperative death and stroke rates were 7.5 % and 6.0 % for the OPCAB group, and 5.4 % ( P = 0.75) and 8.0 % ( P = 0.77) for the CCAB group, respectively. No significant differences were observed for other major outcome endpoints other than cardiac troponin I (OPCAB: 117 +/- 428 ng/ml vs. CCAB: 58 +/- 99 ng/ml, P = 0.028), a result which was probably due to preoperative massive myocardial infarction in two very high-risk patients who underwent OPCAB. A similar outcome was also observed among propensity score-matched pairs. Congestive heart failure ( P = 0.006, OR: 6.366, 95 % CI: 1.682 - 24.093) and baseline cardiac index ( P = 0.018, OR: 0.171, 95 % CI: 0.040 - 0.735) were independent predictors of 30-day postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

OPCAB can be safely performed in high-risk patients with results as satisfactory as those achieved with CCAB.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾高危患者非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)与传统体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(CCAB)的结果。

方法

在一组欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)累加值≥6的患者中,67例行OPCAB,112例行CCAB。

结果

OPCAB组术后30天死亡率和卒中率分别为7.5%和6.0%,CCAB组分别为5.4%(P = 0.75)和8.0%(P = 0.77)。除心肌肌钙蛋白I外,其他主要结局终点未观察到显著差异(OPCAB组:117±428 ng/ml,CCAB组:58±99 ng/ml,P = 0.028),这一结果可能归因于两名接受OPCAB的极高危患者术前发生了大面积心肌梗死。在倾向评分匹配的配对患者中也观察到了类似的结果。充血性心力衰竭(P = 0.006,比值比:6.366,95%置信区间:1.682 - 24.093)和基线心脏指数(P = 0.018,比值比:0.171,95%置信区间:0.040 - 0.735)是术后30天死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

高危患者行OPCAB是安全的,其结果与CCAB一样令人满意。

相似文献

1
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients (EuroSCORE >/= 6).
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;55(1):13-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924484.
5
Benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients.
Circulation. 2012 Sep 11;126(11 Suppl 1):S151-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.083873.
7
Off-pump versus on-pump CABG in high-risk patients: short- and mid-term outcome.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006 Aug;40(4):209-13. doi: 10.1080/14017430600669874.
8
On- and off-pump coronary surgery and perioperative myocardial infarction: an issue between incomplete and extensive revascularization.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jul;34(1):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.031. Epub 2008 May 2.
9
[Coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart in high-risk patients].
Herz. 2007 Sep;32(6):483-90. doi: 10.1007/s00059-007-2857-7.
10
On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction has lower mortality and morbidity.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Mar;135(3):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验